- The Washington Times - Tuesday, March 27, 2012


In his recent Op-Ed, Judge Andrew Napolitano was correct in publicly questioning the scope of H.R. 347, the “Trespass bill” (“Can the Secret Service tell you to shut up?” Commentary, March 16).

I find it odd that a Senate, which has not been able to agree on a budget in three years, can suddenly speak in unison on a bill that opens the door to placing unreasonable limits on free speech. As a former lead agent on the president’s protection detail, I can assure you that every agent is a highly trained professional and is focused on protecting the office or designated protectee, not the policies or agenda. Regardless, this bill places far too much discretionary power in the hands of our government law enforcement representatives.

If used judiciously, H.R. 347 could serve as a valuable law enforcement tool. If it is abused, it is our obligation to preserve our constitutional liberties and press for changes in the law or to vote out of office those attempting to subjugate the law.


U.S. Senate candidate

Severna Park, Md.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide