- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 20, 2012

Republican Sen. Scott P. Brown and his Democratic opponent, Elizabeth Warren, verbally pummeled each other for an hour in a debate Thursday evening, each trying to seize the title of middle-class hero and gain an advantage in their tight struggle for the Senate seat from Massachusetts.

Mrs. Warren spent the 60 minutes trying to paint Mr. Brown as a conservative — a liability in Massachusetts — by highlighting votes from his 2½ years in the Senate, during which he opposed legislation on equal-pay lawsuits, supported a bill that would have effectively overturned a requirement for employers to provide free contraception coverage, and, according to her, stood squarely on the side of big business.

“When you look at the votes, Sen. Brown is always standing over there with the billionaires and big oil companies,” she said.

But Mr. Brown fought hard to appear in the ideological center, three times citing his ranking by a congressional publication as the “second most bipartisan senator” and jumping on chances to point out areas where he agreed with Mrs. Warren.

“I agree with you again, it’s amazing,” Mr. Brown said to Mrs. Warren amid a foreign-policy question posed by moderator Jon Keller, a political analyst with Boston CBS affiliate WBZ-TV.

The Senate race is one of the hottest in the country, fought between Mrs. Warren, a Harvard professor, and Mr. Brown, a rare Massachusetts Republican who managed to win a 2010 special election for the seat of the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy.

To halt Mr. Brown’s Senate career, Mrs. Warren must prevent him from snatching up too many votes from independents and moderate Democrats. For his part, Mr. Brown needs to persuade Massachusetts moderates that he can buck his increasingly conservative party in Congress and represent their views, even as a Republican.

Their tactics weren’t hard to spot in the Thursday debate, the first of four scheduled over the next month.

Mrs. Warren told the television viewers that Mr. Brown isn’t the moderate he claims to be — but took it even further, saying the election isn’t just about whether he wins a single seat, but whether he helps Republicans take control of the Senate, which she warned would lead to committees and legislation being controlled by conservative red-state Republicans.

“It’s not just about Sen. Brown’s vote, this is about the votes of all the Republicans,” she said. “Jim Inhofe the senator [from Oklahoma] would have supervision over the Environmental Protection Agency. And he says global warming is a hoax.”

“You’re not running against Jim Inhofe, you’re running against me, professor,” Mr. Brown responded.

When the topic of abortion came up, he insisted he’s pro-choice just like his opponent, even though he’s been endorsed by pro-life groups in the past.

Mrs. Warren has sought to tie him to the “legitimate rape” comments made last month by Rep. W. Todd Akin of Missouri and she continued attacking him over abortion-related issues Thursday, reminding voters that Mr. Brown voted against confirming Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan.

“I was really surprised when Sen. Brown voted against her,” Mr. Warren said.

Mr. Brown partially defended himself by making reference to his early childhood, when he tried to defend his mother against an abusive boyfriend — a story he has often told.

“You should stop scaring women, professor, because I’ve been fighting for women since I was six years old,” he said.

Even as both candidates raise massive amounts of money behind the scenes, they’re also trying to appear before voters as the populist candidate.

They spent the first part of the debate wrangling over taxes, with each candidate sticking to positions they’ve already laid out: Mrs. Warren supports repealing the Bush tax cuts for those earning more than $250,000, while Mr. Brown has said he won’t support any tax increases, period.

Along with other Republicans in Congress, Mr. Brown has refused to support plans proposed by Democrats to extend the tax cuts beyond this year for the middle and lower classes only. Mrs. Warren seized on that, saying he’s willing to put middle-class tax cuts at risk as he protects wealthy Americans.

“He has just said he’ll defend the top 2 percent or top 3 percent, and he will hold the other 98 percent of families hostage,” she said.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide