- The Washington Times - Friday, January 25, 2013

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Those who seek limitations on gun-magazine capacity as a way to protect others demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of the issues at hand. Not only do these individuals not understand firearms, but they also show a profound ignorance of the dynamics of violent confrontation.

While many aggressors confronted by a potential victim with a firearm will retreat to seek other victims, what happens to those who continue their attacks? Using New York Police Department sources from a recent year, we learn that one officer needs 3.5 to 4.7 shots to incapacitate a single aggressor. If the aggressor opens fire on the officer, the average number of shots needed for an officer to incapacitate him goes up to 7.6.

Home invasion is the fastest-growing crime segment in America and is generally a group endeavor. Obviously, a homeowner with a 10-round magazine facing an aggressive group has a serious problem on his hands. Reloading with additional magazines is complicated by the fact that pajamas are notoriously lacking in magazine pouches.

The best reloads are the ones that aren’t necessary. Limits on magazine capacities will not decrease crime rates — they instead will have adverse impacts on the honest.

WILLIAM R. MOORE

Ladysmith, Va.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide