- Associated Press - Wednesday, January 30, 2013

FORT HOOD, Texas (AP) — The Army psychiatrist charged in the Fort Hood shooting rampage still faces the death penalty if convicted in the worst mass shooting on a U.S. military installation, a judge ruled Wednesday.

The judge, Col. Tara Osborn, was expected to rule later on Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan’s request to plead guilty to 13 counts of premeditated murder in the 2009 attack on the Texas Army post. However, Army rules prohibit a judge from accepting a guilty plea in a death penalty case, so her earlier ruling Wednesday indicates he would not be allowed to plead guilty as long as that punishment option remains on the table.

Defense attorneys argued that Maj. Hasan should be spared a possible death sentence because the military justice system’s process for deciding capital cases is inconsistent. They also claim Fort Hood’s commanding general was not impartial when he decided in July 2011 that Maj. Hasan would face the death penalty and had been influenced by high-ranking government officials.

Maj. Hasan, 42, paralyzed from the waist down after being shot by police the day of the rampage, sat in a wheelchair next to his attorneys with a thick black beard during the first of three scheduled days of pretrial proceedings.

The American-born Muslim also is charged with 32 counts of attempted premeditated murder. He faces execution or life in military prison without parole if convicted. A trial date has not been set.

Witnesses have said that a gunman wearing an Army combat uniform opened fire after shouting, “Allahu Akbar!” — or “God is great!” in Arabic — inside a crowded medical building on Nov. 5, 2009, where deploying and returning soldiers received vaccines and other tests. Maj. Hasan was also about to deploy to Afghanistan.

Maj. Hasan’s trial was to start in August but was put on hold when he appealed the former judge’s order saying his beard would be forcibly shaved before the court-martial unless he shaved it. Although facial hair violates Army rules, Maj. Hasan first showed up in court in June with a beard, later saying it was required by his Muslim faith.

After a few rounds of appeals, the military’s highest appeals court in December tossed out the judge’s order and removed him from the case, saying that he appeared to show bias against Maj. Hasan in some instances. Col. Osborn then was appointed to oversee the case.

In December, during Col. Osborn’s first pretrial hearing in the case, she told Maj.  Hasan that she won’t hold the beard against him but that military jurors might. Jurors likely would be told not to consider Maj. Hasan’s appearance when deciding on a verdict.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide