- The Washington Times - Monday, June 3, 2013

ANALYSIS/OPINION:

Michaela Dodge’s “The do’s and don’ts of defense spending” (Commentary, May 30) urges Congress to shower more money on missile defense in the National Defense Authorization Act, particularly by building an East Coast site. This would be a spectacular waste of taxpayer dollars.

At a recent congressional hearing, Vice Adm. James D. Syring, director of the Missile Defense Agency, was directly asked if the proposals to add $250 million for an East Coast site this year would be helpful. He responded, “Not at this time.” The Pentagon has just begun a two- to three-year site study. Rushing an East Coast site would be like buying a house without a blueprint.

Moreover, a recent report by the National Academy of Sciences determined that the interceptors Ms. Dodge suggests be placed at the site are fatally flawed.

Congress cannot continue to throw taxpayer money down the drain on programs that do not work and the military does not want.

KINGSTON REIF

Director, non-proliferation programs

Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation

Washington


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide