- The Washington Times - Friday, June 7, 2013


The article “As overflows continue, D.C. plan for sewage tunnels getting messy” (Web, June 2) misrepresents the views of the Natural Resources Defense Council with regard to D.C. Water’s proposal to change its commitment to reduce sewage overflows.

Contrary to the article’s implication, NRDC strongly supports integrating smart 21st-century innovations into municipal water-restoration initiatives in Washington and across the nation. “Green infrastructure” techniques often can solve the same flooding and pollution problems as effectively as gray approaches, but with additional benefits such as cost savings and healthier communities.

Because green infrastructure competes well with other stormwater-management techniques and because sewage overflows threaten public health, weakening sewage-overflow protections to accommodate green infrastructure is unnecessary and irresponsible. We cannot give a free pass to D.C. Water or others for simply promising to investigate green infrastructure if doing so means significant cleanup delays and missed opportunities for pollution reduction. These delays are what primarily concern us about D.C. Water’s proposal.


Project attorney, Water Program

Natural Resources Defense Council


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide