- - Wednesday, October 2, 2013


We agree that Judicial Watch should be allowed to observe the hearings at Guantanamo Bay (“Chilling dissent over Guantanamo policy,” Commentary, Sept. 26). More transparency, not less, is a critical check on government abuse, which is one reason why our federal courts are seen as legitimate throughout the world, unlike the tribunals in Cuba.

It is reckless, though, for the writer of this piece to call some lawyers or groups members of the “terrorism bar.” Our country has a rich tradition of ensuring robust representation for even the most unpopular criminal suspects, dating back to John Adams’ defense of British soldiers accused of the Boston Massacre.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, and prominent counterterrorism officials denounced prior attacks on lawyers who represented Guantanamo detainees. As Mr. Graham said, “This system of justice that we’re so proud of in America requires the unpopular to have an advocate, and every time a defense lawyer fights to make the government do their job, that defense lawyer has made us all safer.”


Director, Law and Security Program

Human Rights First


Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide