- The Washington Times - Thursday, September 12, 2013

Virginia Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II tried to repackage a bread-and-butter issue for many Virginians — the state’s coal industry — with a new tone Thursday and put the energy issue back at the forefront of the governor’s race.

An ad attacking businessman Terry McAuliffe, the Democratic candidate, for a purported “war on coal” briefly shows an image of President Obama, followed by flashes of workers and a clip of Mr. McAuliffe saying during his unsuccessful 2009 gubernatorial campaign that “we have got to move past coal.”

“As governor, I never want another coal plant built,” he says, with the ad repeating the line for effect. “As governor, Ken Cuccinelli will fight to protect Virginia coal. And Virginia families.”

The GOP is trying to seize on a report from Bloomberg News this week that a revised plan from the Environmental Protection Agency to limit carbon emissions would effectively outlaw the construction of new coal-fired power plants in the country, according to people who have been briefed on the plan.

“Republicans understand that one of the keys to a growing economy and a stronger middle class is affordable energy, and Democrats across the country are on notice that they will be held to account for supporting job-killing policies like President Obama’s war on coal,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus said Thursday.

Mr. McAuliffe has said this year that he wants to make sure the state has a healthy coal workforce and his campaign has said he would be concerned about plans from Mr. Obama that would increase utility costs in the state or force the shuttering of Virginia plants.

Still, Mr. Cuccinelli, the Republican candidate, is not without his own vulnerabilities on the issue.

The state inspector general is investigating the role of an attorney in Mr. Cuccinelli’s office who provided advice to two out-of-state natural gas companies currently battling farmers in the southwestern part of the state over royalties.

One of them, Consol Energy Inc., has contributed more than $100,000 to Mr. Cuccinelli, who says none of his benefactors receive special treatment from his office.

“If Ken Cuccinelli was serious about putting Virginians first, he would have fought for them in this case,” the Democratic Party of Virginia said in a statement Thursday. “Instead, his office was coordinating with the lawyers opposing them and representing one of his largest donors. Misleading attack ads won’t undo that betrayal.”

A federal judge also expressed frustration in court Thursday that a settlement had not yet been reached in the case.

Sharon Pigeon, a senior assistant attorney general, communicated via email dozens of times with attorneys representing the energy companies, but Mr. Cuccinelli’s office says she was merely offering guidance on the Virginia Gas and Oil Act.

“In the process of suing the gas companies, the lawyers representing the property owners tried to have the Virginia Gas and Oil Act declared unconstitutional,” spokesman Brian Gottstein said. “If they had been successful, most of the property owners wouldn’t get any royalty payments, so our office intervened in the case to uphold the constitutionality of the act, as is our legal obligation.”

A group called NextGen Climate Action Committee, backed by billionaire environmental activist Tom Steyer of San Francisco, is behind a million-dollar campaign against Mr. Cuccinelli involving ads and a series of odd publicity stunts that seek to exploit the case.

Republicans have derided Mr. Steyer’s involvement in the campaign, and Mr. Gottstein said the office’s interest in the case is to resolve it quickly.

“As counsel to the Virginia Gas and Oil Board, [Ms. Pigeon] represents the board’s interest in getting gas ownership issues resolved sooner rather than later, and she was offering her thoughts on how the attorneys could convey to the court that a years-long class action suit would not resolve the ownership disputes which keep the royalties in escrow,” Mr. Gottstein said in a memo. “While the attorney general has characterized the tone of her emails as a bit overzealous, he believes there was nothing wrong with her sharing the information she did in her emails.”

This article is based in part on wire service reports.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide