- Associated Press - Saturday, April 19, 2014

JUNEAU, Alaska (AP) - The Senate Finance Committee proposed an overhaul to a broad-ranging education bill Friday, opting to provide additional money to districts outside the per-pupil funding formula. Critics called the approach disappointing.

The draft rewrite came in the waning days of the legislative session, scheduled to end Sunday. As part of the package, senators proposed $100 million in education funding outside the base student allocation for each of the next three years. That figure incorporates $25 million that had been in the budget for next year, which would essentially make the additional funding for next year $75 million.

Co-chair Kevin Meyer said during a hearing Friday that funding for other initiatives within the bill would be backed out from the $100 million total, which he said could leave perhaps $75 million to be split among districts, roughly. Meyer later told a reporter that point - whether the money for the other initiatives would be taken from the money distributed to schools - had not been decided.

The draft, which is subject to additional changes, borrowed from a number of other bills and ideas that have been floating around the Capitol, including Gov. Sean Parnell’s original bill. The draft includes provisions to allow students to test out of certain courses they’ve mastered, such as math, science and world languages, and to repeal of the high school exit exam, replacing it with a college or career readiness test. It adds support for charter schools, residential schools and correspondence study programs. It calls for funding to improve Internet service for schools with lower download speeds.

It retains provisions added in the House pertaining to teacher tenure and a call for a proposed salary and benefit schedule for districts, a provision that Hanley, when pressed by committee members from rural communities, said he wasn’t wedded to.

Meyer, R-Anchorage, said the bill will provide more choices in education and incentivize districts to do things differently. The goal also was to build of programs that work, he said.

This is not a “status quo” education bill, he said.

The rewrite also calls for a study of how the state funds education. Meyer said there was reluctance to put more money into a formula that some lawmakers believe is broken and will be looked at. He said the plan was for $100 million for three years, with the expectation it will take time to delve into studying the funding issue.

His co-chair, Sen. Pete Kelly, acknowledged that lawmakers can’t bind future legislatures but said the experience has been that when money is put in for education, it doesn’t get taken out.

Becca Bernard, a parent from Anchorage with the group Great Alaska Schools who has become a familiar face in the Capitol halls, said the Senate funding approach was very disappointing.

She said it didn’t provide a reliable source of funding, the way money in the base student allocation would be reliable, and questioned just how much would be available for the classroom and whether it would be enough for districts to stave off cuts.

Senate Minority Leader Hollis French, D-Anchorage, said he’d give the overall bill the grade of a “C,” calling it “fairly tepid.”

Whatever version of the bill that passes the Senate would have to be agreed to by the House or the matter would be sent to a conference committee.

The House bill looked fairly different and took a different approach on funding, too, putting additional money into the base student allocation - about $300 per student over three years - and proposing $30 million in one-time funding for districts. There also had been efforts on that side to make funding-formula adjustments, but those faltered.


HB278: https://bit.ly/1eaPI4E

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide