- Associated Press - Tuesday, April 22, 2014

PHOENIX (AP) - After months of bipartisan support in both Arizona legislative chambers, a bill that would have helped the city of Glendale cover public safety costs during next year’s Super Bowl failed Tuesday in the Senate.

The Senate voted 16-10 against House Bill 2547.

“It just seems to me that this is an awful display of fiscal mismanagement,” said Senate President Andy Biggs, R-Gilbert.


TOP STORIES
Franklin Graham calls on nation to pray for Trump as impeachment effort gains speed
Company co-founded by Nancy Pelosi's son charged with securities fraud
'There will be blood': Maher sees civil war breaking out if we don't 'learn to live with each other'


Biggs criticized the city for spending millions on keeping the Phoenix Coyotes at their current stadium in Glendale but not having enough money to cover public safety costs.

Glendale officials say previous threats to safety at other venues such as the Boston Marathon bombings have increased security costs. They estimate the city will spend $3.2 million on public safety for the game. It spent $2.3 million for that purpose for the 2008 Super Bowl.



Glendale Mayor Jerry Weiers says the city cannot afford to cover those costs on its own, and it might not be able to host in the future without assistance. He said he was extremely disappointed that the bill failed.

“Until we find that (pot) of gold at the end of the rainbow, or one of those machines from the federal government where we start making our own money, we don’t have the funds,” Weiers said.

The bill by Rep. David Gowan, R-Sierra Vista, initially would have reimbursed the city up to $4 million. But amendments watered down the measure, and the latest version would reimburse the city of Glendale for only half the costs it incurred.

The bill was passed by the House with a 33-25 vote on March 45 and received unanimous support in two Senate committees.

But by the time the measure made its way to the Senate floor, things had changed.

“My constituents in Tucson will not see the benefits from this bill. They will only see the detriment,” said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson. “Chances are (visitors) are not going to spend their money in Southern Arizona.”

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide