- Associated Press - Friday, February 7, 2014

LIVINGSTON, La. (AP) - Livingston Parish President Layton Ricks has asked the state Attorney General’s Office to weigh in on his ongoing feud with the Parish Council over the parish’s 2014 budget.

The Advocate reports (https://bit.ly/1e8W4QM ) at issue is whether the council’s budget was legal or validly adopted on Dec. 5 and, if not, whether the parish’s Home Rule Charter or state law governs how officials must proceed.

Ricks vetoed the council’s budget Dec. 19, after District Attorney Scott Perrilloux said it violated state law and the parish’s charter.

Perrilloux said the council’s budget illegally omitted tax revenue dedicated to the parish’s road overlay program, fees for the parish legal adviser and grant funds for ongoing projects.

The council overrode Ricks‘ veto, but Perrilloux said an override could not revive the council’s budget because it was invalid when adopted.

Ricks instead has proceeded under his own proposed 2014 budget, citing a charter provision that says if the council fails to adopt a budget by the end of the year, the president’s proposed budget is considered adopted.

Council Chairman Ricky Goff has said the council’s budget was legal, but even if it weren’t, the parish should follow the Louisiana Local Government Budget Act and restrict itself to 50 percent of its 2013 budget until a new compromise budget for 2014 can be adopted.

In a Feb. 4 letter on Ricks‘ behalf, Perrilloux asked the Attorney General’s Office to settle the matter by determining whether the council’s budget was legal or valid and, if not, which set of laws governs.

“There is some urgency in connection with this request,” Perrilloux wrote, noting that Ricks wants to move forward with a budget but would like guidance from the attorney general first.

With his request, Perrilloux submitted copies of the president’s and council’s budgets, the ordinance enacting the council budget, Perrilloux’s written legal opinion and four prior attorney general opinions, Ricks‘ veto letter, the relevant charter provisions and a timeline of events.

Goff said Thursday the request for an opinion, although “flabbergasting,” does not signal an end to his negotiations with the parish president for a compromise budget.


Information from: The Advocate, https://theadvocate.com

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide