- - Sunday, July 20, 2014

Earlier this year, the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office decidedly set forth a verdict on the effects of a minimum wage increase. While the CBO does not make policy recommendations, its report offers evidence that an increase in the minimum wage does more harm to the low-income individuals it is attempting to help.

It’s a conclusion that shouldn’t surprise anyone. There has been a long-standing consensus that a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage would lower employment for low-skilled workers by 1 to 3 percent. The logic behind this economic truth is simple: Increasing the cost of low-skilled labor leads to a decrease in employers’ demand for their service. This economic truth can be observed while buying tickets to a basketball game on the Internet. As game day approaches, more and more people desire a ticket to the game, so the price of that ticket increases.

The CBO analysts concluded what the majority of economists already knew. On the positive side of President Obama’s proposed increase in the minimum wage from $7.25 to $10.10, 900,000 Americans would be lifted from poverty. On the negative side of the equation, 500,000 Americans would lose their jobs.

The CBO report flies in the face of what the president has touted repeatedly. This past December Mr. Obama gave a speech in Washington stating, “We all know the arguments that have been used against a higher minimum wage. Some say it actually hurts low-wage workers — businesses will be less likely to hire them. But there’s no solid evidence that a higher minimum wage costs jobs.”

Well, Mr. President, here is your “solid evidence” straight from the Congressional Budget Office. But I digress.

In essence, an increase in the minimum wage results in the redistribution of incomes from the very poor, who either lose their jobs or want to get a job, to the working poor, who will get a slight pay increase. Economist Thomas Sowell sums it up well: “The net economic effect of minimum wage laws is to make less skilled, less experienced or otherwise less desired workers more expensive — thereby pricing many of them out of jobs.” Americans must seriously consider whether raising 900,000 citizens out of poverty is really worth the burden of an additional 500,000 unemployed citizens.

For those young Americans who are unemployed, an increase in the minimum wage is a disaster. The first step on the proverbial economic ladder would be chopped off, trapping those young, low-skilled Americans in poverty. Instead of hiring low-skilled individuals, businesses would speed up investment in technology, as can be seen by an increase in self-checkout machines at your local grocery store.

Even if you are a low-income American, raising the minimum wage would still ultimately hurt you. Yes, a $3-an-hour raise would increase your earned income by roughly 30 percent, but you would suffer from an implicit, higher marginal tax estimated at 50 percent. This tax is a result of losing certain benefits, including food stamps and low-income tax credits once your earnings increase.

There must be better ways to improve the living standards of low-income Americans than through this inequitable transfer of income from the unemployed poor to the working poor. Fortunately, conservative leaders like Arthur C. Brooks, president of the American Enterprise Institute, have proposed a better way — increasing the Earned Income Tax Credit. Increasing the federal EITC would supply low-income Americans with the money they need to provide for themselves while giving them the incentive to work and climb the economic ladder.

At a time when the unemployment rate for those aged 16 to 24 stands at over 16 percent, now is not the time to raise the minimum wage. When looking at youth unemployment rates for black Americans, the numbers are even worse: Over 38 percent of young African Americans are currently unemployed.

If the president is serious about helping the least among us, raising the minimum wage is not the answer. A hike in the minimum wage hurts the very people it claims to help.

Armstrong Williams is sole owner/manager of Howard Stirk Holdings and executive editor of American CurrentSee Online Magazine.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide