- Associated Press - Wednesday, May 28, 2014

GONZALES, La. (AP) - Gonzales will be operating at 50 percent of last year’s budget for the time being, with no attempt made to override the mayor’s recent veto of the major parts of the 2014-15 budget.

The Advocate reports (https://bit.ly/1tOROke ) none of the three councilmen who voted for the controversial amendments to the budget that Mayor Barney Arceneaux vetoed on May 21 offered a motion Tuesday night to override Arceneaux’s veto.

It would have taken four votes of the five-member council to override the veto.

With the veto remaining in place, the city will operate on 50 percent of last year’s budget until new general fund and capital outlay budgets are approved. The new fiscal year begins June 1.

Arceneaux has said the city can operate on the reduced budget for about five months before major cuts would have to be made, unless new budgets are adopted.



When Arceneaux vetoed the budgets last week, he cited his objection to cuts in funding for the police and fire departments and the Ascension Economic Development Corp., for the purpose of allocating the funds instead for an $800,000 study of a new service road along Interstate 10.

Those cuts were supported by councilman Gary Lacombe, Terance Irvin and Timothy Vessel.

“I cannot agree to allocate $800,000 to a project surrounded by so many unanswered questions,” Arceneaux said on May 21, at the news conference where he announced the veto.

The study of a service road surfaced again at Tuesday night’s meeting, when the council was due to make its final decision on contracting with CPEX, the nonprofit Center for Planning Excellence, to develop a new master growth plan for the city.

Lacombe, who had made the initial proposal for the service road study of the area along I-10 between La. 30 and La. 44, asked CPEX representative Camille Manning-Broome if the organization could make a study of that area of the city a priority.

“This is a land-use document, not a transportation study,” said Councilman Kenny Matassa, who made a motion to go with the CPEX contract as it stood.

___

Information from: The Advocate, https://theadvocate.com

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide