- The Washington Times - Wednesday, April 8, 2015

President Obama called for an end Wednesday to so-called “conversion therapy” that counsels gay teens and children on how to become straight.

In a posting on the White House’s web site, senior presidential adviser Valerie Jarrett said the administration “supports efforts to ban the use of conversion therapy for minors.”

“The overwhelming scientific evidence demonstrates that conversion therapy, especially when it is practiced on young people, is neither medically nor ethically appropriate and can cause substantial harm,” Ms. Jarrett said.

Her statement was in response to an online petition asking the White House to ban the therapies. The push was prompted by the death of 17-year-old Leelah Alcorn of Ohio, who wrote in a suicide note last December that her parents had forced her to attend conversion therapy.

The petition has received more than 120,000 signatures, more than enough to merit a response from the White House on its “We the People” forum.

California, New Jersey, and the District of Columbia have banned licensed professionals from using conversion therapy on minors. Lawmakers in 18 other states have introduced similar legislation.

Christopher Doyle, president of Voice of the Voiceless and a licensed clinical professional counselor who supports sexual orientation change efforts, has said there can’t be a scientific basis for the claim that the therapy is harmful to children because there are no studies on sexual orientation change efforts and the impact on minors.

Ms. Jarrett said efforts to change an individual’s gender identity “have also been shown in countless instances to have dangerous effects.”

“The American Psychological Association has repeatedly affirmed its stance against these practices, recently stating that efforts to change an individual’s sexual orientation can pose serious health risks” to gay, bisexual and transgender individuals, she said.

In support of its argument, the White House cited the example of Republican New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie, who said while signing his state’s law in 2013 that “exposing children to these health risks without clear evidence of the benefits that outweigh these serious risks is not appropriate.”

Groups such as the New Jersey Family Policy Council have sought to overturn New Jersey’s ban. In February, a New Jersey judge ruled that advertising a service that could change a person’s sexuality is fraudulent and violates the state’s consumer protection laws.

Ms. Jarrett said a national ban would require congressional action, suggesting such a move by the Republican-majority Congress is highly unlikely. But she added, “we are hopeful that the clarity of the evidence combined with the actions taken by these states will lead to broader action that this administration would support.”

California enacted the nation’s first sexual-orientation change effort ban was enacted 2012. That law was also contested in court, but has been upheld by the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide