- Associated Press - Wednesday, July 1, 2015

TROY, Ala. (AP) — Gay couples can petition, protest and even sue, but that won’t change Probate Judge Wes Allen’s mind: He is not issuing them marriage licenses, despite a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that marriage is a constitutional right equally held by all Americans.

Mr. Allen is the probate judge in Pike County, a county in southern Alabama with a population of about 33,000.

He is among a handful of public officials across the Bible Belt who are defying the U.S. Supreme Court by refusing to issue a license to anyone, gay or straight.

Mr. Allen and other probate judges in the state cite Alabama Code section 30-1-9, which says marriage licenses “may” be issued by them — not that they must issue them.

Consequently, Mr. Allen says, he is “not in violation of any Supreme Court order. … We’re just going to hold the course and not issue any marriage licenses.”

Mr. Allen says that he believes marriage “is one man, one woman.”

Separately, on Wednesday, four groups asked a federal judge to force the probate judges to issue marriage licenses.

In a July 1 filing, the American Civil Liberties Union of Alabama and three allied groups asked U.S. District Judge Callie V.S. Granade to confirm that her injunction directing all state probate judges to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples is in effect and requires immediate compliance.

In Kentucky on Tuesday, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis shut her blinds at work to block the view of rainbow-clad protesters outside. They carried flags and signs saying, “You don’t own marriage” and chanted, “Do your job!”

Moments later, Ms. Davis told a lesbian couple who walked in asking for a license to try another county.

“It’s a deep-rooted conviction; my conscience won’t allow me” to grant gay-marriage licenses, Ms. Davis told The Associated Press. “It goes against everything I hold dear, everything sacred in my life.”

Some judges and clerks in Texas have done the same, ordering their offices in the name of religious liberty and free speech to issue no marriage licenses at all.

Legal experts are dubious that religious freedom arguments will protect public officials who not only refuse to participate due to their own beliefs, but also decline to make accommodations so that others who don’t object can serve the public instead.

Two things can happen if a Kentucky clerk won’t issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple: They can resign, or go to jail, said Sam Marcosson, a constitutional law professor at the Louis D. Brandeis School of Law at the University of Louisville.

“If it means that you simply cannot fulfill your duties because of your religious beliefs, what is required of you is that you can no longer hold that office,” Mr. Marcosson said. “That applies to a judge, that applies to a senator, that applies to anyone who holds public office.”

Clerks and probate judges hold the keys to marriage in counties around the country, and in many rural areas, there are few alternatives for hundreds of miles. Couples turned away could seek a court order, and a clerk who still refuses to issue a license could be jailed for contempt, Mr. Marcosson said.

They also risk criminal official misconduct charges, said Warren County Attorney Ann Milliken, president of the Kentucky County Attorneys Association. The misdemeanor, punishable by up to a year in jail, is committed when a public servant “refrains from performing a duty imposed upon him by law or clearly inherent in the nature of his office.”

Casey Davis, the clerk in Casey County, KY, says he won’t resign and he’d rather go to jail than issue a marriage license to a same-sex couple. None have yet come in to get one, he said.

After the Supreme Court declared that marriage is a constitutional right equally held by all Americans, clerks in Arkansas and Mississippi resigned Tuesday rather than be forced to sign the licenses of gays and lesbians.

Linda Barnette, the circuit clerk in Grenada County, MS, for 24 years, wrote in her resignation letter that she is a “follower of Christ” and that she chooses “to obey God rather than man.”

Other reluctant Kentucky clerks gave up the fight Tuesday.

Lawrence County Clerk Chris Jobe, who also serves as president of the Kentucky County Clerks Association, told The Courier-Journal in Louisville that he would resume issuing licenses for fear of being removed from office. Several other Kentucky clerks made similar concessions.

Even in Mississippi, Texas and Louisiana, where governors took the most vigorous stands against Friday’s Supreme Court’s ruling, clerks were issuing licenses.

But in Kentucky, Ms. Davis stayed firm in denying one Tuesday to April Miller and Karen Roberts, a lesbian couple of 11 years who live in Morehead.

The office of Kentucky Attorney General Jack Conway encouraged any couples who are turned away to seek private counsel. Ms. Miller and Ms. Roberts contacted the American Civil Liberties Union of Kentucky to represent them.

“This is where we live; we pay taxes here, we vote here. And we want to get married here,” said Ms. Miller.

Outside Ms. Davis‘ office, drivers honked and waved, flew rainbow flags from their windows and shouted “love must win!”

But a small group also gathered to support Davis, demonstrating the stark divide that remains in the most theologically conservative stretches of the South and Midwest, where state leaders fought hard for years to prevent same-sex marriage.

“Our country is on the wrong path. We as a people no longer exalt God,” said Dennis Buschman, who carried a Bible as he led a half-dozen people supporting the clerk’s defiance. He called homosexuality an “abomination” and a “serious, serious sin.”

Some protesters confronted them.

“God did not elect her, I did,” said Kevin Bass, a former police officer who arrived at the courthouse with his wife to support gay couples seeking licenses. “If she objects to doing her job, she can go.”


Galofaro reported from Morehead, Kentucky. Associated Press writers Jeff Amy in Jackson, Mississippi; and Adam Beam in Frankfort, Kentucky; contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide