- Associated Press - Thursday, July 16, 2015

LOS ANGELES - The same organization that backed a landmark case on California’s teacher tenure laws is funding a lawsuit filed Thursday that takes aim at districts not enforcing an act that requires student achievement data to be used on teacher evaluations.

The suit filed by four parents and two teachers in Contra Costa County Superior Court alleges 13 districts around the state have signed collective bargaining agreements that explicitly prohibit compliance with the 1971 Stull Act.

The suit states that the districts fail hundreds of thousands of children by refusing to enforce the law.

The plaintiffs are backed by the non-profit group Students Matter, founded by Silicon Valley entrepreneur David Welch.

Students Matter also funded plaintiffs in the 2014 Vergara v. State of California ruling that found five California Education Code provisions - including policies allowing teachers to receive tenure within two years and be dismissed during layoffs on the basis of seniority - were unconstitutional because they deprived some of the state’s 6.2 million students of a quality education.

Superior Court Judge Rolf M. Treu said the statutes particularly burdened poor and minority students.

The new lawsuit aims to force districts to comply with the Stull Act, which requires districts to evaluate teachers based on four criteria, one of which is student progress as measured by performance on state assessments, when applicable.

The suit targets San Ramon Valley Unified, Chino Valley Unified, Saddleback Valley Unified, Chaffey Joint Union High School District, Ontario-Montclair, Fairfield Suisun Unified, Antioch Unified, Inglewood Unified, Victory Elementary School District, Upland Unified, Pittsburg Unified, Fremont Union High School District and El Monte City School District.

A total of about 250,000 California students attend those districts.

“In the absence of proper evaluation of teachers, school districts cannot reasonably know whether teachers are actually promoting and advancing student learning over time,” the lawsuit states.

The legal action comes at a time when there has been a growing backlash against the use of standardized tests in the nation’s schools.

John Rogers, an education professor at the University of California, Los Angeles, said there is still considerable dispute among researchers about the role student data, and in particular, value-added measures, should play in teacher evaluations.

He said too often the debate has focused on using student data to identify which teachers should be fired - rather than incorporating that data into professional development and helping teachers improve.

“The policy problem we have is not who to fire,” he said, “but how do we bring more teachers into the profession? Because increasingly, we are facing shortages again.”


This story has been corrected to state that two teachers, not one, are plaintiffs in the lawsuit.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide