- The Washington Times - Friday, November 20, 2015

Planned Parenthood Action Fund’s social-media campaign asking for a one-word description of its work so far hasn’t turned out exactly as planned.

Not unless responses like “deceitful,” “barbarous, “villainous,” and “scandal-ridden” were what organizers had in mind.

After calling Thursday on its Twitter account for “one word you would use to describe PP,” Planned Parenthood Action Fund received hundreds of responses, the vast majority of which were critical—sometimes virulently so, as several commenters noted.


TOP STORIES
Franklin Graham calls on nation to pray for Trump as impeachment effort gains speed
Nunes to 'definitely' take legal action after phone records disclosed in impeachment report
GOP resolution looks to block Dem candidates from Senate impeachment trial


“[G]oing through the replies on twitter, I don’t think this was the best idea,” said a comment from Sergeant Sid on @ppact.

Emma H. Ehrlich gave a positive comment—“vital”—but added that, “y’all need to rethink your social media strategy, this is bait for loons.”



A word cloud created by commenter Jonathan Staab showed that the most popular replies were “murderous,” “evil,” “butchers,” and “Lamborghini,” a description used by a Planned Parenthood doctor to describe an affiliate’s fetal-tissue procurement program in a hidden-camera video.

Planned Parenthood has swung back with a forceful public-relations campaign since the release starting in July of 11 hidden-camera videos by the pro-life Center for Medical Progress, which launched a national debate over whether the organization is profiting from fetal-tissue acquired from abortions.

The videos have also sparked federal and state efforts to defund the organization. prompting Planned Parenthood to counter by emphasizing its role in what it describes as the delivery of “vital reproductive health care, sex education, and information to millions of women, men, and young people worldwide.”

This latest effort to boost Planned Parenthood’s image, however, went “very, very poorly,” as the Federalist’s Mollie Hemingway put it.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide