- - Sunday, February 7, 2016


Scores of dead white men glared back at them from the walls of the college dorm. The thought that some of those esteemed alumni could have actually owned their ancestors apparently haunted the dreams of some of the privileged, elite students at Yale so much that they took to the yard in protest. The dorms at Yale, they have declared, are no longer a “safe space” for black students.

Not far away from Yale’s New Haven, Connecticut, campus, in rural York County, Pennsylvania, a 12-year-old is dealing with the usual cruelties meted out by middle-school kids, compounded with an extra dose of racial hostility. Fed up with the ongoing bullying, he writes an open letter to the school demanding redress:

“To Whom It May Concern:

“Yesterday on the football bus coming from our football game a kid started saying racist things to me. He told me 200 years ago my ancestors hung from a tree and after he said that I should I hang from a tree. That made me super mad, so in the locker room I told him not to call me n–-r or that I should be hung on a tree. I’m tired of boys messing with me because of my skin. I’m at my boiling point with this. Please do something about this because when I bring it to the office/principal, you do nothing about it and I’m tired of the racism.”

These two fragments represent the dimensions of race faced by a new generation of black Americans. On the one hand, they are evidence of the immense progress that has taken place in the country over the past 60 years or so. The very fact that there are significant numbers of black students at elite universities is a testament to that progress. That a 12-year-old boy attending a public school in a predominantly white Pennsylvania county openly voiced his frustration speaks to his expectation that the grown-ups in the room must exhibit better leadership. That’s progress too.

But we also have regressed in some ways. At the University of Missouri, students demanded (and received) the resignations of university administrators whom they perceived as being inadequately responsive to their complaints about racial hostilities on campus. But their need to be coddled was so strong that even the ousters of the university’s president and provost were not enough. Their list of eight demands included the creation and “enforcement” of a “comprehensive racial awareness and inclusion curriculum throughout all campus departments and units, mandatory for all students, faculty, staff and administration.”

Ironically, on the heels of this demand for a mandatory “inclusion” curriculum, the black student activists then proceeded to ban white students who had joined in solidarity with their protests, citing the need for a black-only space for “healing.”

This demand ignores the question, of course — given all of the recent hostility — of whether any white students felt injured and also need healing rather than more divisiveness. One wonders how, at a university whose student population is over 90 percent white, such confrontational tactics will succeed in helping black students win over people and change things sustainably.

A group of “poor,” “righteous” and indignant students at Dartmouth College took us back even further. They actually invaded what should be a college’s safest space of all — the campus library. They barged into the library as other students were studying and assaulted white students, hurling despicable racist epithets that have been widely publicized and do not bear repeating.

It also goes without saying that these rash, immature youngsters need to immediately apologize to the students they harmed and seek to make amends. Or they should be suspended or otherwise appropriately disciplined by the college.

At the end of the day, these recent incidents are not really about attempting to achieve more inclusion or redressing racial wrongs. They are actually about an “offended” generation claiming an inherent right to be coddled, entitled and accorded group privilege based on the assumed mantle of victimization.

They have unfortunately grown up on a steady diet of liberal-media hogwash, one that finds a bigot behind every door to achievement and a racial slight in almost every utterance that challenges their worldview. But above all, they have come to expect that the world owes them something.

Belief in an engineered “equality” to the exclusion of freedom of thought and speech leads inevitably down the road toward fascism. Appealing to authoritarian intervention in a bid to guarantee outcomes almost always leads to disastrous consequences. Real equality doesn’t mean everyone gets the same things, or even has access to exactly the same opportunities. It means that no institution — whether government or university — is biased in favor of one group or another. Because, as the lessons of history have taught us, equality without freedom is utterly useless.

Armstrong Williams is manager and sole owner of Howard Stirk Holdings I & II Broadcast Television Stations and executive editor of American CurrentSee online magazine.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Copyright © 2019 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times welcomes your comments on Spot.im, our third-party provider. Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide