- The Washington Times - Thursday, May 12, 2016

 How times have changed, and standards have lowered.

In 1981, designer-jean maker Calvin Klein found itself in hot water with the public for a suggestive TV ad featuring Brooke Shields. “You know what comes between me and my Calvins?” the 15-year-old model and actress asked, answering, “Nothing.”

While certainly suggestive, it left something to the imagination.

Fast forward 35 years later, and the fashion label is under fire for a new advertising campaign that is much more explicit, involving in one instance an upskirt photo on Calvin Klein’s Instagram page. Another image depicts a model’s hands jammed inside her panties, with the caption, “I pulse in #mycalvins.”

Esquire, no prudish publication, derided the campaign as “Ridiculously Sexual and Definitely NSFW.”

Reaction via social media was divided but largely angry.

“[A]wful ad. Your concept looks predatory. This ‘upskirt’ photo invites men to do this to women. Disrespectful,” tweeted a woman from New York City.

“I get that @CalvinKlein likes to ‘go there’, push the envelope and show too much skin but this is just creepy and too far. Not ok in my book,” tweeted another woman.

“Geez — pushing the limits of fashion does not have to include soft porn,” complained a Kansas City man.

Copyright © 2018 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

The Washington Times Comment Policy

The Washington Times is switching its third-party commenting system from Disqus to Spot.IM. You will need to either create an account with Spot.im or if you wish to use your Disqus account look under the Conversation for the link "Have a Disqus Account?". Please read our Comment Policy before commenting.


Click to Read More

Click to Hide