- The Washington Times - Tuesday, May 26, 2020

All-mail elections have been going on for years in some states, and from the liberal bastions of Oregon and Washington to rock-red conservative Utah, the voters who use it love it.

President Trump is not a fan, however, and calls it a recipe for fraud.

He is mounting an all-out assault in person, on Twitter and in the nation’s courts to keep states from expanding mail-in voting options during this year’s elections.

Mr. Trump said Tuesday that the recent order by California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, to expand mail-in voting would turn the country into “a joke” and could help create a “rigged system.”

“You can’t do the mail-in ballots because you’re going to have tremendous fraud,” Mr. Trump said at the White House. “And remember what I said: They’ll be grabbing [ballots] from mailboxes, they’ll even be printing them. They’ll use the same paper, the same machines, and they’ll be printing ballots illegally and they’ll be sending them in by the hundreds of thousands and nobody’s going to know the difference.”



With his name on the ballot, Mr. Trump has a deeply personal stake in the fight.

Academics with less skin in the game say some of his fears about fraud are valid, though overwrought. They also generally dismiss his suspicion that the more people vote by mail, the worse Republicans do in elections.

Most studies show no clear partisan advantage in states that allow all or mostly mail elections.

Oregon, Washington, Utah, Colorado and Hawaii send ballots to every voter, though that doesn’t mean all ballots are returned through the mail. Coloradans can drop off their ballots at designated locations before 7 p.m. on Election Day.

In 2016, 73% of Coloradans dropped off their ballots in person, as did 59% of voters in Oregon and 65% in Washington, according to the Election Lab at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Voters in the five states are thrilled with the system, according to polling by YouGov in March. Approval ranges from 77% in Oregon to 87% in Hawaii.

Phil Keisling, who was secretary of state when Oregon became the first to adopt all-mail voting in the 1990s, said he was skeptical at first but has been converted.

“I liked the traditions: The crunch of the autumn leaves, the crisp blue sky, saying hello to my neighbors, so I understand what people are not sure about,” Mr. Keisling said. “Like that piece of great Western literature, Dr. Seuss’ ‘Green Eggs and Ham,’ when voters have the chance to actually try it, they realize they actually like it.”

Mr. Keisling said Oregon has not had major fraud incidents.

Thirty other states allow no-excuse-needed absentee voting, which means any voter can cast a ballot by mail. The other states require an approved excuse — though, in some, such as Virginia, the governor has said fear of the coronavirus is a valid excuse, effectively turning next month’s primaries into no-excuse absentee voting.

The risk, according to the five vote-by-mail states, is that others are rushing into all-mail elections without doing the groundwork. Election officials in those states have been fielding calls from other states, and their answer is to be aware.

Voter rolls must be kept scrupulously clean so ballots go only to current addresses for valid voters. Sometimes new equipment is needed to count votes, and signature cards need to be kept up to date.

MIT’s Election Lab says that while fraud is rare, it “seems to be more frequent” with mailed ballots than in-person voting.

On Tuesday, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey announced criminal fraud charges against a rural mail carrier accused of altering absentee ballots from Democrat to Republican.

No two states’ all-mail elections are conducted the same, nor have they yielded comparable results clearly favoring any particular party or political philosophy.

Colorado overhauled its elections system in 2013, but voter behavior did not immediately change as a result. Two-thirds of voters in the 2014 general election returned their votes in person, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts analysis.

By 2018, though, the state’s turnout for a midterm congressional election was its highest ever and trailed only Minnesota’s among the 50 states, according to a report from Nonprofit VOTE and the U.S. Elections Project.

Hawaii ranked last in turnout in 2018 before it adopted all-mail voting. The general election this November will be the first major test for the state.

Hawaii’s Office of Elections has told voters to expect a ballot packet to arrive in the mail about 18 days before the summer primary and the fall general election. Like Coloradans, they can mail it back or drop it off in person.

Hawaii relies heavily on signatures and barcodes to verify a voter’s identity, whereas first-time voters in Colorado may need to provide a copy of their identification alongside their signature to have their vote count.

The bar codes on the envelope contain Hawaiians’ “ballot secrecy sleeve” and the individual ballots, which are used to guard against voter fraud.

Vote-by-mail in that manner provides several disadvantages and advantages. The National Conference of State Legislatures lists “security” as a possible disadvantage because family members or others may coerce voters, away from the scrutiny of poll watchers. States deploying vote-by-mail for the upcoming elections have created websites where voters can track their ballot to ensure it is received and counted.

One advantage is the potential cost savings. The logistics of vote-by-mail saved Coloradans more than $6 per vote by reducing costs 40% across five election-administration categories, according to a Pew Charitable Trusts analysis.

Sen. Ron Wyden, an Oregon Democrat who is a major proponent of the state’s system, tried to get Congress to add $2 billion for state election assistance in the COVID-19 stimulus package. In the end, the bill included $400 million for election security, which does include expanding vote-by-mail.

“Look, America could be faced with a choice this fall of either Americans being able to vote, which means vote-by-mail, or not voting at all,” Mr. Wyden said on a call with reporters in March. “And our case to [Republicans] is that’s not even a close call.”

Mr. Trump, though, is determined to block as much mail voting as possible.

At one point, he threatened to withhold federal money from Michigan if the state pursued mail-in voting. He inaccurately said the state had sent all voters ballots, but the secretary of state sent ballot applications, which can be returned to request a ballot.

The Republican National Committee this week announced that it was suing Mr. Newsom to try to block the California governor’s executive order expanding mail-in voting for the state in November.

“The United States cannot have all Mail In Ballots,” the president said on Twitter over the weekend. “It will be the greatest Rigged Election in history. People grab them from mailboxes, print thousands of forgeries and ‘force’ people to sign. Also, forge names.”

Mr. Trump said “some absentee OK, when necessary.” He voted absentee in Florida’s primary this year. But he criticized politicians who he said were “trying to use” the COVID-19 pandemic to advance their political goals.

Twitter attached a label to Mr. Trump’s Tuesday tweets about voter fraud, directing viewers to “Get the facts about mail-in ballots” and redirecting to a Twitter page that says the president made false claims.

Whatever happens this year, Mr. Trump is likely fighting a losing battle in the long run as Americans embrace the mail option.

MIT’s Election Lab says that in 1992, more than 90% of voters cast ballots on Election Day. By 2016, it was just 60%, with the other 40% split about evenly between in-person early voting and mailed-in ballots.

Sign up for Daily Newsletters

Manage Newsletters

Copyright © 2020 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

 

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide