- The Washington Times - Tuesday, December 6, 2022

The number of U.S. abortions rose annually from 2017 to 2020, led by a spike in chemical abortions and reversing a 37-year decline, a study found.

The report by the pro-choice Guttmacher Institute did not examine the reasons for the increase in abortions, but experts attributed it to the ease of using the abortion pill, less-restrictive state and federal laws, and government cuts in contraception funding.

The number of abortions rose 8%, from 863,320 in 2017 to 930,160 in 2020, the study found. The abortion rate increased by 7% from 13.5 to 14.4 abortions for every 1,000 women ages 15-44 over that period, the group’s study found.



The number and rate of abortions had declined every year since 1980, from 1.5 million procedures and a rate of 29.3 for every 1,000 women.

“This study did not address factors behind the increase in abortion,” Guttmacher said in a summary. “However, this report demonstrates that the need for abortion care was growing just prior to the overturning [of] Roe v. Wade, and the impact of this decision will be even more far-reaching than previously expected.”

Medication or chemical abortions reported by clinics and doctors’ offices soared by 45% from 339,650 in 2017 to 492,210 in 2020.

Guttmacher found that the share of women who terminated pregnancies using the abortion pill, most commonly mifepristone and misoprostol, rose from 39% in 2017 to 53% in 2020.

The number of chemical abortions is likely higher because the study did not include those performed at home, said Tessa Longbons, a senior research associate at the pro-life Charlotte Lozier Institute.

“Abortion pills shipped by illegal international groups like Aid Access fall through the cracks,” Ms. Longbons said in an email. “Even Guttmacher is reliant on voluntary reporting that forces them to fill in the gaps with their own best guesses.”

Trump-era cuts in federal funding for contraception also could have led more women to terminate their pregnancies, said Mary Ziegler, a leading expert on the legal history of the U.S. abortion debate.

“I think medication does make it easier, in theory, for people to have telehealth abortions. It’s also less intimidating than going to a clinic for surgery in many places,” said Ms. Ziegler, a law professor at the University of California, Davis. “But I don’t think most people make the decision to have an abortion based on what kind of abortion they’re having.”

Abortion pills became more widely available because of a 2016 policy change at the Food and Drug Administration.

Liberalizing policies at state and federal levels usually result in abortion increases, said Michael New, a Catholic University of America professor of social research.

He pointed out that in Missouri, where the last clinic stopped offering abortions in 2020, Guttmacher found that the number of abortions fell by 96% from 4,710 in 2017 to just 170 in 2020.

In Maine, where Medicaid started covering elective abortions in 2020, Guttmacher found a 13% increase from 2019 to 2020. That was the fifth-highest percentage increase of any state and much higher than Maine’s 3% increase from 2017 to 2019, Mr. New said.

“Public policy matters,” he said in an email.

Abortions likewise increased by 24% from 2017 to 2020 in Illinois, where Medicaid started covering elective abortions in 2018.

Guttmacher found that the number of abortions increased by 14% from 2019 to 2020 in Virginia. In 2020, the state repealed several pro-life laws mandating a 24-hour waiting period, ultrasound testing and informed consent.

The numbers confirm that women in abortion-restricting states find other ways to terminate their pregnancies, said Daniel K. Williams, another leading historian of the abortion debate.

“Restrictive state abortion laws do decrease abortion rates by very modest amounts, but they have not proven to be a very efficient or effective way of reducing the number of abortions nationally,” said Mr. Williams, a history professor at the University of West Georgia.

“States that prohibit abortion providers from operating will find it very difficult to stop people from obtaining abortion pills elsewhere, especially since people can bypass the American medical system entirely by ordering abortion pills online from an international supplier.”

Complicating matters, the federal government doesn’t require states to report their abortion numbers. Undercounts are likely to worsen as more women hide their abortions in states that have added restrictions since the Supreme Court overturned the Roe v. Wade national right to abortion in June.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reported 1% annual abortion rate increases in 2018 and 2019, but the CDC’s latest report found a slight decrease in 2020, contradicting Guttmacher’s findings.

Forty-seven states reported data to both the CDC and Guttmacher in 2020. In those 47 states, the CDC counted about 114,000 fewer abortions than Guttmacher did — an undercount of more than 16%. In New York and New Jersey, the CDC undercounted by more than 40%.

Analysts say Guttmacher provides more comprehensive data than the CDC, which relies on voluntary reporting from states, by surveying abortion providers and patients directly.

California, the nation’s largest abortion-providing state, has not reported its numbers to the CDC since 1997. According to Guttmacher, abortions in the state increased 16% from 132,680 in 2017 to 154,060 in 2020.

In an email to The Washington Times, a CDC spokesperson acknowledged that the agency’s report on 2020 did not include California, Maryland or New Hampshire, which she said account for 20% of all abortions in the U.S.

“Despite the legal requirement in most states and jurisdictions for medical providers to submit a report for every abortion they perform to a central reporting agency, enforcement of this requirement varies,” the CDC spokesperson wrote. “As a result, abortion numbers that some areas report to CDC are different than those obtained by the Guttmacher Institute’s national survey of abortion-providing facilities, which uses active follow-up techniques in conducting their periodic survey of abortion-providing facilities.”

In New York, the state with the second-highest number of abortion providers, New York City does not consistently report abortions to the CDC.

“The clear inaccuracies in abortion reporting make it impossible to truly know how many unborn Americans’ lives this horrific practice has taken,” Joy Stockbauer, an analyst at the pro-life Family Research Council, said in an email.

Experts say that suggests more women will turn to abortion pills in states that have moved to restrict clinics.

“The increase in U.S. abortion rates and increase in pill abortions, reported and non-reported, demonstrates a tactical failure of the pro-life movement,” said Dwain Currier, public policy director of the American Life League. “These deadly tactics give cover to so-called pro-life lawmakers while at the same time give legitimacy to the business of preborn child killing.”

• Sean Salai can be reached at ssalai@washingtontimes.com.

Copyright © 2023 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Please read our comment policy before commenting.

Click to Read More and View Comments

Click to Hide