As states rush to redraw their congressional maps, President Trump moved Thursday to get his team involved, saying he’s ordered the government to conduct a new count of the country’s residents — but this time without illegal immigrants. Here’s what you need to know about the Trump census order:
The Trump directive
President orders Commerce Department to conduct new count:
- Trump announced on social media he “instructed” Commerce Department to start work
- Department oversees Census Bureau
- Ordered “immediately” start work on “new and highly accurate” count
- “People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT be COUNTED IN THE CENSUS”
The potential impact
New count could shift congressional seats between states:
- Could shift several seats from states with high illegal immigrant populations
- Would also spark “hefty constitutional questions”
- Slimmed-down census without illegal immigrants long-term conservative goal
- Based on both principle and politics arguments
The conservative rationale
Republicans argue illegal immigrants shouldn’t determine representation:
- Say illegal immigrants aren’t part of broader body politic that should be counted
- Fear Democrat-led states and localities get more congressional seats
- Also affects state legislature representation when illegal immigrants counted
- Argue counting creates unfair political advantage
The constitutional questions
Constitution calls for counting “whole number of free persons”:
- Document excepted Indians “not taxed” and included three-fifths compromise for slavery
- Also called for count “within every subsequent term of ten years”
- Left it to Congress to legislate on how counting done
- Whether Trump’s vision fits constitutional framework likely to be tested in courts
The seat shift projections
Study shows potential changes from excluding illegal immigrants:
- Two demographers John Robert Warren and Robert Warren published study this year
- If illegal immigrants hadn’t been included in 2020 count, would have shifted two seats
- Seats would have gone from Texas and California to New York and Ohio
- 2010 census would have seen larger shifts
The historical impact
Decade earlier would have seen more dramatic changes:
- After 2010 census, California would have lost three seats
- Texas and Florida would have lost one apiece
- Gains would have gone to Montana, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio and North Carolina
- Electoral College affected but not enough to change election results
The legislative support
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene announces supporting legislation:
- Georgia Republican announced legislation to exclude illegal immigrants from census
- Trump touring Florida’s Gator Gitmo detention facility backed idea with Gov. DeSantis
- “Ron would love it. I would love it” said Trump
- DeSantis skeptical that little would change politically
DeSantis’s political calculation
Florida governor sees potential for significant seat gains:
- “We only got one seat in the last Census”
- “Florida only had one seat in that? We should have had at least two”
- “Texas should have had another one”
- “That could be the difference in the House of Representatives, and the majority”
The first-term precedent
Trump previously tried to adjust census during initial presidency:
- Sought to add citizenship question to 2020 count
- Supreme Court stepped in and shut him down before final deadline
- Chief Justice John Roberts said Trump likely had legal authority
- But didn’t follow correct rulemaking process for adding new question
The 2020 legal battle
Previous attempt to exclude illegal immigrants from count:
- Trump tried to order Commerce Department to provide states count without illegal immigrants
- Drew immediate legal challenge from opponents
- Three-judge panel ruled Trump’s order illegal
- Supreme Court held matter was premature and vacated lower court ruling
The Biden reversal
Current president set stage for Trump’s new attempt:
- President Biden rescinded Trump policy on taking office
- Action set Trump up for his “do-over now”
- New count will be “based on modern day facts and figures”
- Will use “results and information gained from the presidential election of 2024”
The redistricting context
Census order comes amid broader map-drawing battles:
- GOP-led Texas trying to redraw lines now to undo minority voter districts
- Started “dominoes toppling” with Democrat-led states retaliating
- Apportionment divides House’s 435 seats among states
- States then redistrict by drawing congressional district lines
Read more:
• Trump orders new census count to exclude those in U.S. illegally
This article was constructed with the assistance of artificial intelligence and published by a member of The Washington Times' AI News Desk team. The contents of this report are based solely on The Washington Times' original reporting, wire services, and/or other sources cited within the report. For more information, please read our AI policy or contact Steve Fink, Director of Artificial Intelligence, at sfink@washingtontimes.com
The Washington Times AI Ethics Newsroom Committee can be reached at aispotlight@washingtontimes.com.
Please read our comment policy before commenting.