- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
White House treats malaria as a global ‘human crisis’
Question of the Day
Some groups contend that the PMI, while welcomed, is not large enough to eradicate the disease by itself. They say more funding should be directed to international groups such as the Global Fund.
“It needs to be balanced by the multilateral side as well,” David Bryden, spokesman for the Global AIDS Alliance (GAA), said of U.S. malaria funding.
Mr. Bryden argues that the administration’s request of $300 million for the Global Fund in fiscal 2008 isn’t enough, saying the government should give $1.3 billion and challenge the rest of the world to increase their contributions.
“They’ve not been smart enough in channeling money that grows the overall pot,” he said.
Mr. Bryden’s group and others, such as the Global Health Council, are lobbying Congress as 2008 funding bills progress on Capitol Hill. He said the House has proposed $850 million for the Global Fund and the Senate has proposed $890 million.
Dr. Paul Zeitz, executive director of GAA, said the Group of Eight leaders’ recent pledge of $60 billion to fight AIDS, malaria and tuberculosis — while welcome — is only one-third of the $192 billion that the United Nations estimates is needed over the next five years.
“This is not an issue of ‘more money is always needed when it comes to poverty,’ ” he said. “Rather, the full amount is needed so that we can actually get ahead of these health crises.”
Spraying pesticides also has been criticized.
WHO stopped actively promoting indoor residual spraying of DDT and other pesticides to control malaria in the 1980s because of heightened concerns about the safety of DDT.
In September, WHO endorsed the spraying of DDT, saying it poses no health risk when used properly.
Some still aren’t convinced.
The Pesticide Action Network North America argues that DDT is “incontrovertibly linked” to health issues, including increased miscarriage and developmental delays in children.
Another challenge is delivering the help to outlying areas with little or no infrastructure.
Exxon Mobil’s Dr. Phillips said that while nets, indoor sprays and drugs are effective in stopping malaria, it takes a highly coordinated effort to make sure these tools make it to the people who need them.
By Ted Cruz
Israel saves its enemies; Hamas endangers its friends
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- U.S. troops told not to eat, drink in front of Muslims during Ramadan
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world