- ‘Game of Thrones’ earns a leading 19 Emmy nods
- Ann Coulter: Chris McDaniel should concede, live to fight another day
- Chelsea Clinton nabs $75K in speaking fees — same as Dick Cheney
- ‘Year of action’ not over: Obama has worked around Congress more than 40 times
- Rick Perry: Obama showed up after Hurricane Sandy, why not the Texas border?
- Alec Baldwin in talks to play Rob Ford-like mayor in new NBC drama
- Chinese hackers sought data on federal employees: report
- League City, Texas, votes 6-2 to ban processing of illegal kids
- Iraq tells U.N. that ‘terrorist groups’ have seized nuclear materials
- Houston dad suspected of shooting his 4 kids surrenders to police
WETZSTEIN: Same-sex marriage blocked
Question of the Day
On Nov. 4, voters in California, Arizona and Florida changed their constitutions to say that marriage is the union of a man and a woman. This brings the tally of these marriage amendments to 30.
There’s more to talk about - California’s amendment is being challenged in court, for instance.
But for today, I have two observations.
One is that 20 states do not have constitutional marriage amendments, and that’s not likely to change. As a result, the 12-year marriage-amendment-on-the-ballot gambit may have now run its course.
Second, and more unsettling for proponents of gay marriage, these amendments reflect the genuine will of the nation. More on that in a second.
First, 20 states do not have state marriage amendments (SMAs).
Gay marriage is legal in two states - Connecticut and Massachusetts - and lawmakers in nine states - Maryland, Maine, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington - seem more amenable to gay-friendly laws than a SMA.
In five states - Iowa, Indiana, Minnesota, Pennsylvania and Wyoming - it’s possible lawmakers might enact an SMA, but these are long shots.
In the remaining states - Delaware, Illinois, North Carolina and West Virginia - lawmakers are even less likely to consider SMAs, given their track record on the issue.
This means that while it’s possible another SMA could appear on a ballot, nothing is imminent.
Proponents of gay marriage may breathe a sigh of relief at this, but my second point will not be comforting.
A long-favored argument for gay marriage is the proponents’ battle is comparable to the battle to legalize interracial marriage. Indeed, when the California Supreme Court ruled for gay marriage in May, it drew parallels between the gay plaintiffs and Richard and Mildred Loving’s battle to overturn Virginia’s ban on white-black marriage.
In 1967, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Lovings and instantly rendered all state anti-miscegenation laws unconstitutional.
But here’s the inconvenient truth. For the first part of the last century, interracial marriage was illegal in 30 states. But this began reversing itself in 1948, and by 1959, interracial marriage was legal in most states. (This history can be found at http://www.lovingday.org/map.htm).
When the Lovings’ decision came down, only 17 states still outlawed interracial marriage. Thus, the high court’s decision was completely compatible with a trend that was naturally sweeping the nation.
About the Author
Cheryl Wetzstein covers family and social issues as a national reporter for The Washington Times. She has been a reporter for three decades, working in New York City and Washington, D.C. Since joining The Washington Times in 1985, she has been a features writer, environmental and consumer affairs reporter, and assistant business editor.
Beginning in 1994, Mrs. Wetzstein worked exclusively ...
- Census: More first-time mothers give birth out of wedlock
- Activists sue to block New Hampshire abortion 'buffer zone' law
- Pace of state laws against abortion slows in 2014
- Abortion clinic buffer zone ruling creates temporary reprieve, push for new laws
- Three-week D.C. faith revival kicks off
Latest Blog Entries
- Gay therapy ban author seeks Calif. House seat
- Transgender 'bathroom law' gets 5,000 more signatures
- Pro-life, stem-cell bill signed into law by Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback
- N. Dakota lawmakers approve tough abortion bill
- Pope Benedict XVI's successor should allow priests to get a new title: Husband, poll finds
By Ted Cruz
Banning speech with a constitutional amendment is playing with fire
- GOP: Lerner warned IRS employees to hide information from Congress
- White House plans for bowling alley upgrades abruptly canceled
- ISTOOK: Flying illegals home would be 99.5 percent cheaper than Obamas plan
- Islamic militants aim to take Baghdad airport
- EDITORIAL: Whats Obama hiding at illegal-alien 'refugee' camps?
- Harry Reid lambasted by black conservatives after calling Justice Thomas white
- HUSAR: Mexicos Pena Nieto passes the immigration bucket
- Obama requests $3.7 billion to fight surge of illegals
- A series of missteps steers Obama's trip off course
- CURL: Obama turning millennials into Republicans
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs
U.S.-Ghana World Cup opener