EDITORIAL: No mandate for government health care

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Some say it’s unconscionable. Others say it’s unconstitutional. Either way, it’s clearly unpopular. For any smart senator, it ought to be reason enough not to advance the unwieldy and unworkable health care bill being pushed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

In this case, “it” is the so-called “individual mandate” that is included in every Democratic version of Obamacare. The bills all force each American to buy health insurance, whether they want it or not. They impose fines of $750 (which would surely rise) for failure to comply. And while the Reid bill forbids government from imposing liens on private property for failure to pay the fine, it still might allow the Internal Revenue Service to subtract the fine amount from individual tax returns. It also provides for civil penalties plus interest.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s version of the bill is worse, by far. Obstinate refusal to pay the fine, after refusal to buy insurance, “is punishable by a fine of up to $250,000 and/or imprisonment of up to five years.” How nice: Buy insurance or go to jail.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus has said that without the individual mandate, the whole complicated contraption falls apart. For every senator even remotely on the fence about the bill as a whole, that reality ought to be a deal killer. Both as policy and as politics, the mandate is a horrible idea.

The moral case against the mandate comes not only from conservatives or moderates, but from the political hard left as represented by powerful blogger Markos Moulitsas of the Daily Kos. On Tuesday night, he wrote: “My take is that it’s unconscionable to force people to buy a product from a private insurer that enjoys sanctioned monopoly status. … It would effectively be a tax - and a huge one - paid directly to a private industry. … If you want a similar model, watch how universities increase tuition to absorb increased financial aid opportunities.”

One need not share Kos’ antipathy for private industry to find it unconscionable for government ever to force people to buy a personal product they don’t want. The Congressional Budget Office has written that “a mandate requiring all individuals to purchase health insurance would be an unprecedented form of federal action. The government has never required people to buy any good or service as a condition of lawful residence in the United States.” CBO is right on target.

On the right, many legal analysts have concluded that the mandate is unconstitutional. Against this conclusion, mandate sponsors say their authority comes from the Constitution’s grant of power to Congress to regulate interstate commerce. But in a 16-page Dec. 9 “legal memorandum” published by the Heritage Foundation, Randy Barnett, Nathaniel Stewart and Todd Gaziano note that “the individual mandate provision regulates no action. To the contrary, it purports to ‘regulate’ inactivity … [in other words,] the doing of nothing at all! … If Congress can mandate this, then it can mandate anything. Congress could require every American to buy a new Chevy Impala every year. …”

The American people recoil at such assaults on their freedom. An Oct. 19 Galen Institute poll showed that 71 percent of those surveyed oppose an individual mandate. A Nov. 16 Associated Press poll showed 64 percent disapproval. Public opposition to government health care has grown over the past month, so the numbers against the mandate are likely even higher today.

Unconscionable, unconstitutional, unpopular - that’s a trifecta no sensible senator would embrace.

blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts