The Washington Times
  • Subscribe
  • Customer Services
  • RSS
  • Mobile Headlines
  • e-edition
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • REGISTER
  • LOG IN
  • E-MAIL ALERTS
  • WELCOME
  • Your Profile
  • Log Out

  • Front Page Image
  • Classifieds
  • Autos
  • Real Estate
  • Jobs
  • Special Sections
  • Times News Services
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Sports
    • NFL
    • NBA/WNBA
    • MLB
    • NHL
    • Tennis
    • Golf
    • Motorsports
    • Soccer
    • NCAA
    • Olympics
    • Outdoors
    • Алекс Овечкин
  • Culture
    • Home & Living
    • Family & Kids
    • Fashion
    • Food
    • Travel
    • Health
    • Washington Visitors
    • Books
    • Military History
    • Life
    • Auto
    • TV Listings
    • Movie Listings
    • Death Notices
    • Entertainment
  • Themes
  • Communities
    • Donne Travels
    • Lives Common
    • National Pastime
    • Politics 101
    • Stories of Faith
    • Civil War
    • Middle - America
    • Chicago Blue State
    • Zadzooks
  • Marketplace
    • Autos
    • Jobs
    • Real Estate
    • Classifieds
    • Shopping
    • Dining Out
    • Education
    • TWT Store
  • Videos
    • Two Guys
    • Birnbaum on Washington
    • Liz Glover
    • Amanda Carpenter
    • Morning Briefing
    • Documentaries
  • Podcasts
    • About Headlines
    • Inside the Beltway
    • Inside the Story
Home > Opinion > Editorials

EDITORIAL: ... Silencing the people

By | Wednesday, January 7, 2009

  • Bookmark and Share
  • Article
  • Comments ()
  • Print
  • [-][+] Font Size
  • E-Mail Alerts
  • Tell a Friend
  • Got a Question?
  • You Report
  • Click-2-Listen

On New Year's Eve, when Russians were reveling in their biggest holiday of the year, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev signed into law a bill that effectively ends any pretense that Russia is a democracy. The bill terminates jury trials for crimes such as treason, revolt, sabotage, espionage and terrorism - what Mr. Medvedev calls "crimes against the state." Those accused of such crimes will now be tried by a panel of three judges instead of by a jury of their peers. This means that the Kremlin is now abrogating one of the last vestiges of individual rights - especially for dissidents of the regime - and is slipping into a totalitarian regime reminiscent of the age of dictator Joseph Stalin.

The elimination of jury trials is all the more chilling when considered in tandem with a parallel piece of legislation that is being advanced by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. He is proposing expanding the definition of treason to include endangering Russia's "constitutional order, sovereignty, and territorial integrity." In a similar manner, espionage will be redefined to include providing information to foreign nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) - in effect, almost any action that threatens domestic security will be considered espionage. This bill to expand the definition of treason and espionage has not yet been passed in parliament, but is likely to do so. If the redefinition becomes law, then critics of the regime can be more easily apprehended, tried by a panel of judges and convicted on the grounds that they threaten the security of the nation. The very fear that one might be subject to these procedures will greatly inhibit free speech.

Advocates of the abolition of jury trials insist that the state does not have sufficient tools to protect the people: Duma Security Committee chief Vladimir Vasilyev contends that jury trials by peers, especially in the North Caucuses region, result in the acquittal of suspects by fellow family or clan members. Yet, the abolition of jury trials is so extreme that it turns the state itself into an instrument of terror.

Mr. Medvedev and Mr. Putin are now turning the clock back. Jury trials were banned in 1917, when the Bolsheviks seized control of the state; they were reinstated in 1993 as part of a series of democratic reforms that were meant to end the sweeping state control over the lives of citizens. The abolition of jury trials follows another power-grab - the recent extension of the presidential term from four to six years, which has been widely perceived as paving the way for the return of Mr. Putin to the presidency. And this time, he will have more power than ever before.

Western leaders must be vociferous in their condemnation of Russia's systematic dismantling of democracy. If the attacks on democracy are not curtailed, and Russians themselves do not speak out, the only voice left will be that of tyranny.

[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reprint permissions!
Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC

Bookmark and Share

Comments

Read Comments

Post your comment:

Please login or register to post a comment

Do you have another point of view, photos, audio, video or more information about a story?

  •  A new law drafted by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's Cabinet would allow authorities to label any government critic a traitor - a move that leading rights activists condemned Wednesday as a chilling reminder of the times under Soviet dictator Josef Stalin. Associated Press.

Click the photo to enlarge.

Advertisement

Top Stories

Most Read

  1. Clinton urged Obama to talk tough on Iran
  2. Rep. Kaptur gets $3.5 billion sweetener in climate bill
  3. EDITORIAL: Toss your ticket
  4. PAUL: 'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice
  5. Why stagflation is coming
  6. Conyers supported project linked to wife
  7. U.S.-Afghan push targets Taliban haven

Most Shared

  1. Powell airs doubts on Obama agenda
  2. PRUDEN: Ol' Stupid begins to notice things
  3. U.S. 'ready' for N. Korean missile
  4. PAUL: 'Fight them over there vs. over here' a false choice
  5. Why stagflation is coming
  6. Energy job losers could get windfall
  7. The Al Franken shtick
  8. The Founding Fathers
  9. New data indicate recovery not near
  10. Time for a tea party

Most Commented

  1. Jeb Bush, GOP: Time to leave Reagan behind
  2. WH communications director leaving
  3. Freddie Mac acting CFO found dead
  4. Kerry aims to rescue newspapers
  5. Fidel Castro: Obama 'misinterpreted' words
  6. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  7. President Obama said those who approved harsh interrogation techniques for suspected terrorists may be subjected to criminal charges. Do you agree?
  8. Gibbs: Pay no attention to what Rahm said
  9. Politics' Talking Heads Highlight Speaker Series
  10. Fleecing Mike Ditka

Poll

Will you be traveling this 4th of July weekend?

Market Data

Advertising Links
TWT Store
  • e-edition
  • Print Edition
  • Weekly Washington Times
TWT Affiliates
  • Middle East Times
  • Golf
  • UPI
  • Arbor Ballroom
  • Washington Times Global
  • About TWT
  • Press Room
  • F.A.Q.
  • Work for TWT
  • Advertise
  • Sponsors
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Site Map

All site contents © Copyright 2009 The Washington Times, LLC.