U.S. boosting force in Afghanistan

President Obama on Friday will order 4,000 more military advisers to Afghan forces and will look to forge an international diplomatic coalition determined to dismantle al Qaeda in Pakistan and root out the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Arguing that he was left a situation with increasing violence, resurgent terrorism and no real strategy for victory, Mr. Obama, in a speech Friday morning, will make the case for the increase in U.S. trainers as a way to get more performance for less money. The advisers are in addition to 17,000 combat troops Mr. Obama plans to send.

“It’s a lot less expensive to fully fund an Afghan soldier on the battlefield than it is to send someone from North Carolina, from the 82nd Airborne Division, on the battlefield,” a senior administration official told reporters Thursday evening on the condition of anonymity as he previewed the president’s remarks.

The new strategy is the result of a 60-day review Mr. Obama ordered at the beginning of his administration, and the president will say it marks a turning point of nearly eight years of war because it will view Afghanistan and Pakistan as one challenge, both for diplomacy and U.S. aid.

The strategy will include tripling U.S. nonmilitary aid to Pakistan to $1.5 billion a year for the next five years, will require the deployment of hundreds of civilians to help with diplomacy and aid, and will seek to persuade U.S. allies to back the new strategy, with money and manpower.

The Washington Times reported key elements of the plan last week, including increased financial aid and helicopters to help Pakistan ferry its troops to remote areas along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border to fight the Taliban and its tribal allies.

Administration officials said a key goal is to convince people in Pakistan that the war is not only a U.S. fight, but also their own battle. They said that sense has been lost and that many in the United States consider the fight to be “Bush’s war.”

Members of Congress were briefed Thursday, and key lawmakers said the plan is an important step.

Sen. Carl Levin, Michigan Democrat and chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, told the Associated Press that the training group is needed because there aren’t enough U.S. military advisers in the region. Sen. John McCain, Arizona Republican, told the wire service that it seemed like a viable strategy as long as the manpower is there.

“I know we need more than the 17,000,” he said.

A participant in the Afghanistan-Pakistan review told The Times last week that it makes economic and political sense to build a bigger Afghan army because it costs about $12,000 a year to support one Afghan soldier compared with $250,000 a year for an American.

Administration officials said Thursday night that the administration will lay out benchmarks such as incidents of violence and number of suicide bombings, and would regularly measure to determine whether the strategy was working.

The additional troops will be fully in place by fall. Officials said they hope to have their first evaluation of how the boost in numbers is working by the fall or winter.

The goal, the senior administration official said, will be “to disrupt, dismantle and eventually destroy al Qaeda’s safe havens and sanctuaries in Pakistan its infrastructure, its support network and to deprive it from being able to develop such sanctuaries in Afghanistan.”

Story Continues →