- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
Climate-bill foes likely to seize on CBO’s scoring
Question of the Day
Congress‘ chief scorekeeper says the global warming bill moving through Congress will either be scored as a major tax increase or a massive expansion of the federal government - and either one could give opponents substantial ammunition to complicate Democrats’ efforts to pass a bill.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in a letter sent last week to House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman, said Democrats’ approach of creating allowances for emitting greenhouse gases requires developing from scratch a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars.
Whether the allowances are sold, as President Obama wants, and scored as a tax increase, or given away, as House Democratic leaders have suggested, and scored as “cash grants” to businesses, opponents are lining up to use CBO’s conclusions as ammunition in the public relations battle over the bill.
“This is a tax increase, and what you’re giving away to businesses are tax breaks,” said Michael McKenna, a Republican energy lobbyist involved in planning strategy for the bill. “Who’s paying for all of this? It couldn’t possibly be clearer - the consumers of the United States of America. Talk about feeding into a story line.”
Republican leaders in Congress have argued that Democrats’ approach to global warming will impose a large new cost on businesses, which will be passed on to consumers in the middle of a recession. Democrats say action is needed to avert the effects of warming and say they can mitigate some costs.
Democrats and environmentalists both said the letter is not the last word from the CBO, and Democrats said they hope to work with the agency to try to bring down the cost of the bill to the government.
The CBO letter sent Friday was obtained by The Washington Times. It marks the second time in a week that CBO has complicated the path for those who want to control greenhouse-gas emissions through a so-called “cap-and-trade” plan.
Last week, CBO issued a paper prepared for Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee Chairman Jeff Bingaman, New Mexico Democrat, that said global warming controls cannot guarantee any outcome and said the Earth’s temperature will continue to rise - possibly 0.5 degrees to 1.6 degrees Fahrenheit this century - even if greenhouse-gas emissions never exceed today’s levels.
Several analysts said CBO’s letter to Mr. Waxman could undermine Democrats’ schedule to get the bill on the House floor because it gives the Ways and Means Committee a strong argument to claim jurisdiction as well.
The six-page CBO letter also listed repeated examples of situations in which, for purposes of the federal budget, it will assume that the cap-and-trade approaches will dampen businesses’ income, meaning less revenue to the federal government.
To be budget neutral, Democrats will have to come up with other spending cuts or revenue increases.
A Democratic committee aide, speaking on the condition of anonymity per committee policy, said they are going to continue working with the CBO on the scoring.
“One of our key principles is to make sure the legislation is budget neutral. We are consulting closely with CBO to ensure we meet this principle,” the aide said.
Dan Lashof, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council’s climate center, said the CBO will still have to issue a final score on the bill when it passes the committee, and NRDC hopes the letter is not the last word.
“What they have left out of their analysis is the benefit to consumers of energy efficiency - that actually lowers their bills. I don’t see anywhere in this long set of examples this accounts for that,” Mr. Lashof said.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Lois Lerner emails reveal gaping open-records loophole
- Two-thirds of illegal immigrant children approved for asylum: report
- Top Justice official denies conspiring with IRS on tea party targeting
- Boehner: No bill on border surge
- Taking Obama to court a long shot but lawsuit not folly, Congress is told
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq