- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Cuccinelli: Virginia has right to regulate abortion clinics
Question of the Day
Virginia has the legal right to regulate abortion clinics in the same manner it currently regulates hospitals and surgery centers, says Attorney General Kenneth T. Cuccinelli II — a ruling that pro-choice advocates say could cost abortion providers $2 million and put most of them out of business.
An opinion issued Friday by the pro-life Republican comes after years of attempts by conservative legislators to pass additional restrictions in the General Assembly for abortion clinics, which in Virginia have been treated for regulatory purposes as physicians’ offices.
“The state has long regulated outpatient surgical facilities and personnel to ensure a certain level of protection for patients. There is no reason to hold facilities providing abortion services to any lesser standard for their patients,” said Brian J. Gottstein, a spokesman for Mr. Cuccinelli.
“Even pharmacies, funeral homes and veterinary clinics are regulated by the state,” he said.
Tarina Keene, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia, said meeting the structural requirements of the regulations could cost as much as $2 million and would be “financially prohibitive” for abortion providers.
“This is definitely based on political ideology,” she said. “We want nothing more than to have the safest guidelines and regulations. But this isn’t an attempt to make abortion safe, this is an attempt to make abortion inaccessible.”
The opinion, which only interprets Virginia law and does not change it, says the additional regulations are permissible as long as they “adhere to constitutional limitations.”
Mr. Cuccinelli acknowledged in the opinion that the Supreme Court’s 1973 Roe v. Wade opinion limits the state’s right to regulate abortion.
But he also cited a 2000 decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit that said regulations “addressing medical and safety aspects of providing abortions, as well as the recordkeeping and administrative practices of abortion clinics, and which applied to all abortions including abortions performed during the first trimester, were valid.”
Mentioning rules implemented in 1981 that were withdrawn in 1984, Mr. Cuccinelli said Virginia “previously exercised this authority.”
In a footnote, he describes those regulations, which included, among other requirements, “disclosure of ownership, limits on abortions performed in the clinics to those occurring in the first trimester, presence of a medical director and appropriate nursing and counseling staff, and detailed clinical area design.”
The opinion was prepared in response to questions from state Sen. Ralph K. Smith, Roanoke Republican, and Delegate Robert G. Marshall, Prince William Republican, about whether Virginia can regulate facilities that provide first-trimester abortions as well as the medical personnel who perform them.
Current Virginia law applies to second-trimester abortions and lawmakers have not been able to pass legislation that applies to clinics that only perform first- trimester abortions.
“The attorney general’s opinion makes it clear that the dangers documented in hundreds of medical journal articles at the National Library of Medicine can be addressed by the governor in regulations to protect the health and safety of women who go for first-trimester abortions in Virginia,” Mr. Marshall said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Matthew Cella is The Washington Times’ Metro editor. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- DYRS fails to assess, house, monitor D.C. youth in its custody
- Federal govt. expansion helped D.C. prosper through recession: CFO
- Rasmussen poll gives McAuliffe a 17-point lead over Cuccinelli
- Maryland lawyers argue new gun laws won't cause 'irreparable harm'
- 19-year-old woman charged in killing of Woodbridge high school student
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Democrats cite pope in call for minimum wage hike, jobless benefits
- In court filing, NCAA denies legal duty to protect athletes
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Entertainment News and Reviews from Washington, D.C. and beyond.
In a world that is increasingly complex, we need to seek greater awareness of the blending of cultures and America's changing role in a global community.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow