- WWII vet en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- SWAT team at Phoenix hospital as armed man clears emergency room
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle dragged from political meeting, booted from party
- Big storm dumps snow on East Coast, travel dicey
- Thai prime minister dissolves Parliament, calls elections
- Hagel to meet with Pakistan’s prime minister
- Kiev: Riot police deployed near protest sites
- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
- U.N.: Afghanistan slow to enforce law protecting women
- Heart cancels SeaWorld concert after ‘Blackfish’ documentary
MURRAY & SUTHERLAND: Uncle Sam wants to cuddle
Nanny-state embrace gets tighter
We have heard much recently about the “Europeanization” of America, particularly in the context of socialized health care or expanded environmental regulation. Yet few have noticed what is perhaps the most insidious instance of America becoming more like Europe: the growth of the nanny state and the collective infantilization of its citizens.
For an example of the nanny state run amok, look no further than our closest cultural neighbor, the United Kingdom. There, aristocratic disdain for the lower classes has been replaced by an outright ban on anything the nation’s political masters deem inappropriate. Britain’s Labor Party created a whopping 4,300 new offenses during its 13 years in government. Some are frivolous. Some are redundant. Almost all have, to an unprecedented extent, unnecessarily expanded government control over behavior that should be governed by common sense.
No wonder government spending skyrocketed in the United Kingdom. Laws seeped and snuck into the fabric of British society without much opposition because they weren’t recognized as the threats to freedom they are. Insidiously, this encroachment on liberty happened slowly enough to pass by largely unnoticed.
Now similar policies threaten to change American society. Instead of federal laws, many nanny-state regulations are coming into effect at the state and local levels, helped along by aggressive campaigns from leftist advocacy groups.
For instance, San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom recently decreed that all shops selling mobile phones must display radiation-emission information next to each handset. With at least two-thirds of Americans using cell phones, this policy could well spread to other cities.
And to what end? Cell-phone cancer scares have happened before, but they have no scientific basis. It is a basic concept of biophysics that cancer can be caused by radiation that ionizes molecules in living cells. Cell-phone radiation is simply not strong enough to do that. As the University of Maryland’s warrior against “voodoo science,” physics professor Bob Park says cell phones are “far below the cancer-energy threshold.” San Francisco, quite simply, is acting arbitrarily.
Is the creation of new offenses such as “Obstructing an authorized person from inspecting apple, pear, peach or nectarine orchards for the purposes of ascertaining whether grubbing up has been carried out” really a good use of government resources? Obliging the agendas of single-interest groups is a terrible way to make policy and can only lead to ever more government waste and expansion. This explosion in legislation has increased government influence and encroached on individuals’ civil liberties.
Moreover, in a state where virtually everything is forbidden, the citizen has to look to the state for permission to do virtually everything. In the most literal sense, it is a nanny state, where the citizen is treated as a mewling infant. And when people are treated like children, they lose the initiative to take on adult responsibilities. All the great American virtues - self-reliance, resilience, entrepreneurialism - will wither on the vine. That is the reality of “Europeanization.”
The old Roman Tacitus wryly observed, “The most corrupt state has a lot of laws.” Unless Americans rein in their legislators and demand something like the Great Repeal Act being planned by the new British government, the American republic will be in for some dark days ahead.
Iain Murray is a vice president and Anne Sutherland a research associate at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. Both are British citizens.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
Get Breaking Alerts
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- POWELL: The Fed's scandalous monetary policy
- As the unemployed wait, lawmakers debate about extended benefits
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment