- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Deadly N.Y. train derailment leads to Senate call for cameras at tracks
- WWII vet, 90, en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- SWAT team at Phoenix hospital as armed man clears emergency room
- Kim Jong-un’s uncle dragged from political meeting, booted from party
- Big storm dumps snow on East Coast, travel dicey
- Thai prime minister dissolves Parliament, calls elections
- Hagel to meet with Pakistan’s prime minister
- Kiev: Riot police deployed near protest sites
- Elton John blasts Russia’s anti-gay laws during Moscow concert
Debt commission falls short on test vote
President Obama’s high-profile debt commission Friday fell three votes short of the support it needed to forward a far-reaching deficit reduction plan to Congress, with 11 of the 18 members voting to back the proposal. A supermajority of 14 votes was needed to formally endorse the blueprint.
The final tally became a foregone conclusion Thursday night after Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, Montana Democrat, and Andrew Stern, the former head of the Service Employee's International Union and one of Mr. Obama’s personal picks for bipartisan commission, announced their opposition to the proposal.
Despite achieving a majority vote in support that many thought unlikely just a few weeks ago, the math made it impossible for the plan to gain the support of 14 of the commissioners, which Mr. Obama demanded in his February executive order establishing the panel. The plan combined deep spending cuts, some tax increases, the elimination of popular tax breaks and longer-term reductions in Social Security benefits and health care spending.
While the vote put a damper on the commission’s plan, the chairmen, former Senator Alan K. Simpson, a Republican, and Erskine Bowles, a Democrat and the former chief of staff to President Clinton, remained upbeat, saying their report has started an “adult conversation” over the trillion-dollar deficits and $13.8 trillion national debt that will drive the dialogue going forward.
“We took a big banana and threw it into the gorilla cage,” Mr. Simpson told the panel. “The gorilla has picked it up and like they do, they peel it, play with it, but they will eat some.”
Despite falling short, deficit hawks said they were cheered by the majority vote and by the fact that several prominent commission members had voted in favor, including Senate Majority Whip Richard Durbin, Illinois Democrat, Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, North Dakota Democrat, and Sen. Tom Coburn, the Oklahoma Republican who is one of the chamber’s most outspoken critics of excessive federal spending. Mr. Durbin was one of a number of panelists who said he did not agree with all the recommendations in the report, but thought the plan could be the basis for a sustained attack on the deficit in the next Congress.
Mr. Obama, who was making an unannounced visit to Afghanistan as the panel voted Friday morning, released a statement that said the commission “met the charge that I gave them: to bring our deficits down in the medium term and to meaningfully improve our long-run fiscal situation so that we can keep commitments made to future generations.”
While commission members said they agreed that ballooning interest from the nation’s mounting red ink threatens to drown the economy by 2020, it became increasingly clear that they did not agree on the combination of revenue increases and spending cuts needed to address the problem.
Opponents of the plan — three Republican lawmakers, three Democratic lawmakers and Mr. Stern — fell back on familiar arguments against the proposal’s tax increases and substantial cuts to sacred cows such as Social Security and Medicare.
Democrats suggested that the plan’s strategy to tackle the debt problem, which in part was been driven by unfunded wars, tax cuts and the prescription drug plan passed under President Bush, put too heavy a burden on the backs of people who need government most.
They also criticized plans push to make Social Security solvent by gradually raising the retirement age for future enrollees and reducing benefits.
“There is no need to cut benefits to Social Security,” said Rep. Jan Schakowsky, Illinois Democrat and opponent of the plan.
Republicans, meanwhile, said little Friday morning, but have disagreed with the proposed tax increases in the plan and argued that more must be done to tackle increasing health care costs.
During the meeting, the plan received a boost, as 14 senators called on the White House and Congressional leaders to push forward to address the fiscal challenges of the nation regardless of the commission’s final vote.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Sen. Rand Paul: 'I am seriously thinking about' running for president in 2016
- Sen. Rand Paul pushes 'economic freedom zones' for Detroit
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- New battlefront emerges in war between Republicans, tea party
- Democratic infighting erupts over 'we can have it all' fantasy on entitlements
Latest Blog Entries
- Sen. Ron Johnson: Obamacare failures bolster GOP's chances of winning Senate
- Edward Snowden voted The Guardian's person of the year
- Cochran seeks 7th term, sets up another tea party primary battle
- Rep. Jeff Duncan knocks Sen. Harry Reid for handing staff Obamacare exemptions
- Rep. Randy Neugebauer: GOP seeks food stamp savings in farm bill
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- EDITORIAL: Health care hardball
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- South Carolina sheriff refuses to lower American flag for Nelson Mandela
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- FENNO: Mike Shanahan's empty words no salve to free-falling Redskins
- POWELL: The Fed's scandalous monetary policy
- As the unemployed wait, lawmakers debate about extended benefits
- Sen. Rand Paul: Supreme Court needs to re-examine Fourth Amendment
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Television commentary, reviews, news and nonstop DVR catch-up by Lisa King Dolloff and friends.
Al Maurer provides a common sense, conservatarian, Constitutional conservative perspective from the battleground state of Colorado
Film Reviews and Articles by Kevin Williams
"Critical thinking is thinking about your thinking while you're thinking in order to make your thinking better." - Dr. Richard Paul
Let it snow
White House pets gone wild!