- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
SIMMONS: AIDS prevention relies on behavior
Question of the Day
Abstinence. The most effective HIV/AIDS inhibitor known to man. Antiretroviral drugs. Some of the most effective inhibitors made by man.
Both are lifesavers, yet the former mistakenly gets short shrift.
GlaxoSmithKline and Shionogi Inc. announced this week that they are in the final stages of clinical testing on the next-generation antiretroviral drug, called S/GSK1349572. Merck & Co. and another pharmaceutical, Gilead, have HIV-fighting drugs, too.
You may not have heard the news about these updates, all part of the good, the bad and the ugly at the International AIDS Conference in Vienna, Austria, which wraps up Friday.
Much of the work at the biennial confab was overshadowed by venomous protesters and the blame-America crowd, who say the U.S. president and U.S. taxpayers aren't spending enough money to battle the dreaded disease.
Shame on them, because we aren't shortchanging anyone when it comes to funding. The ledgers prove that Americans have been leading the way since Day One nearly 30 years ago.
That doesn't mean we aren't shortchanging ourselves, though. When it comes to our moral consciousness, which urges us to push abstinence, we fall way short. Today, with millions dead and dying, we face the same crossroads we did in the 1980s, when the "gay men's disease" first began its puzzling and deadly course.
We know what causes HIV, and each year, innovative researchers discover more about how to treat the meandering virus. And, praise the Lord, Americans willingly fork over tens of billions of dollars for research, testing and treatment.
But what about prevention?
Handing out clean needles and condoms should not be our first line of defense. Both widespread policies enable risky behavior that can lead to transmitting sexually transmitted diseases and new HIV infections.
Have we lost sight of the obvious reason why Congress, a full decade after HIV/AIDS became a public health menace, tacked the words "and prevention" onto the title of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC).
Unlike polio, measles, pertussis and other communicable diseases monitored by the CDC because of the threats to public health, HIV/AIDS has no vaccine or immunization to prevent infection.
And while we rightly no longer call it the "gay men's disease," the bottom line regarding infection remains unchanged: risky behavior; sharing IV drug needles; multiple sex partners; contaminated blood transfusions; homosexual sex; heterosexual sex; breast-feeding; male and female prostitution.
Need I say more?
Thank goodness for faith communities that still accept the Bible as the gospel. While hundreds of demonstrators hurled criticisms at Americans, faith leaders continued along the third rail of HIV/AIDS - that is, changing human behavior.
It would be nice if those same Cain-raisers in Vienna and their American cohorts would focus more energy on preventing new infections.
Even President Obama's new HIV/AIDS strategy, whether you agree with all or part of his approach, zeroes in on prevention on our own home front, where 56,000 new infections are recorded each year.
For sure, we must continue providing assistance to people already infected. Not to do so would be inhumane. But in order to really and truly combat HIV/AIDS, we must attack the disease on the front end. Americans willingly fall in line when it comes to such preventive measures as smoke detectors, seat belts, vaccinations, recycling and the like. There even are movements that rail against animal fur, animal testing, and dog- and cockfighting.
The same common sense should be the rule of thumb regarding HIV/AIDS prevention.
Yet there is no "Just don't do it!" movement.
- Deborah Simmons can be reached at email@example.com
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Award-winning opinion writer Deborah Simmons is a senior correspondent who reports on City Hall and writes about education, culture, sports and family-related topics. Mrs. Simmons has worked at several newspapers, and since joining The Washington Times in 1985, has served as editorial-page editor and features editor and on the metro desk. She has taught copy editing at the University of ...
- SIMMONS: What happened in Vegas can't stay in Vegas
- SIMMONS: Tell Joe Biden and the NAACP that politics aren't black and white
- SIMMONS: Youthful sounds of music stirring in Prince George's County
- 'No cellphone' sidewalk pops up in D.C.
- SIMMONS: Archie Andrews saves the gay
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq