- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
Clinton on the stump for Lincoln
Senator hopes to avoid trend on incumbents being ousted
Hoping to avoid becoming the next high-profile incumbent to fall this political season, Sen. Blanche Lincoln is banking on a last-minute campaign boost from former President Bill Clinton to pull out a come-from-behind win in Tuesday’s Democratic primary runoff vote.
Mr. Clinton, a favorite son, has come home in recent days to stump for Mrs. Lincoln, who also enlisted the former Arkansas governor in her radio ads.
Still, with less than a week to go, the incumbent two-term senator faces a slight deficit in her race against Lt. Gov. Bill Halter. Rep. John Boozman from Fort Smith has already nailed down the Republican nod and figures to be a strong contender in November.
Mrs. Lincoln, like congressional moderates from Pennsylvania, Utah and Alabama who have already been tossed out in 2010, is under fire from her party’s restive base. In Mrs. Lincoln’s case, a Democratic Party left wing frustrated with her votes on labor issues and her lukewarm support of the Obama administration’s health care bill has risen to help bankroll Mr. Halter’s challenge.
“I know you’re angry at Washington,” Mrs. Lincoln said in her latest campaign commercial. “Believe me, I heard you on May 18” - the day she was pushed into a runoff after failing to get a clear majority in the Democratic primary.
The race has become one of the most expensive contests in Arkansas history - more than $10 million combined and counting - with Mrs. Lincoln backed by business groups and establishment Democrats like Mr. Clinton and President Obama, and Mr. Halter riding national support from unions and environmentalists.
One such “green” group, the League of Conservation Voters, jumped into the campaign on Mr. Halter’s behalf Wednesday with a new ad criticizing Mrs. Lincoln’s ties to the oil and gas industry.
And Mr. Halter has pulled in other out-of-state support - especially from California.
In fact, according to a McClatchy Newspapers report, California residents lead all states, including Arkansas, in individual contributions to Mr. Halter, a Stanford graduate and a former Clinton administration official.
The Clinton connection to both candidates drew a provocative challenge Thursday from the National Republican Senatorial Committee, which asked the Halter campaign pointedly whether the former president had intervened, as he had done in the Pennsylvania Senate race, on behalf of the Obama administration to dissuade the lieutenant governor from running against Mrs. Lincoln.
Mr. Clinton has been sharply critical of the opposition to Mrs. Lincoln.
He said organized labor is using the Arkansas race to punish Mrs. Lincoln, who voted against a bill that would have eased restrictions on union organizing.
“In other words, this is about using you and manipulating your votes to terrify members of Congress from other states,” Mr. Clinton said
Maryland-based pollster Del Ali’s Research 2000 poll last week had Mr. Halter at 47 percent leading Mrs. Lincoln with 44 percent - but that was before Mr. Clinton weighed in.
“If Clinton hadn’t become involved,” he said, “I absolutely think Halter would win this … but Clinton is such an ‘X factor.’ He’s still very popular in the state. But will that translate into votes on Tuesday? I don’t know.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Eldridge joined The Washington Times in 1999 and over the next seven years helped lead the paper’s coverage of regional politics and government, Sept. 11, and the sniper attacks of 2002. In 2006, he was named managing editor of the paper’s website. He came to The Times from the Telegraph in North Platte, Neb., where he served as executive ...
- Silver: GOP has 60% chance to retake Senate
- Country Times: As all-timers go, Cash remains The Man (In Black)
- COUNTRY TIMES: Is Taylor's relationship with Nashville coming to a Swift end?
- COUNTRY TIMES: Nashville's collaboration with Doobie Brothers a natural partnership
- COUNTRY TIMES: Dierks Bentley is here to save country music
Latest Blog Entries
- Mainers would rather move to Canada than down South
- McCain: 'Stand your ground' laws may need review
- Sen. Tom Coburn: Holder investigating himself is a 'total conflict of interest'
- CNN poll: IRS, AP and Benghazi haven't dinged Obama's approval rating
- Slain diplomat's mom on Obama's Benghazi comments: 'Bullfeathers'
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Gun control supporters send message to NRA
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014