- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
- ‘Duck Dynasty’ Phil Robertson suspended ‘indefinitely’ for gay quip
- John Podesta eats crow: ‘I apologize to Speaker Boehner’
- U.S., China race to finish line on ‘invisibility cloak’
Security coalition set to oppose cuts
Question of the Day
A coalition of conservative national security groups is launching an initiative that calls for strengthening U.S. defenses and opposing what they say is an effort by the Obama administration to weaken security.
Announcement of the new coalition to promote a return to the Reagan-era policy of “peace through strength” follows two speeches last week by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates urging cuts in defense spending and limits on force structure.
In a speech to the Navy League on Friday, Mr. Gates questioned the Navy’s plans to build a new destroyer and new missile submarine, and asked whether the military could afford to maintain 11 aircraft carrier strike groups when no other nation can match them.
On Saturday, Mr. Gates said in a speech to the Dwight D. Eisenhower Presidential Library and Museum in Kansas that he will seek to cut up to $15 billion by eliminating excessive Pentagon bureaucracy.
Frank Gaffney, director of the Center for Security Policy, which helped organize the coalition, said the group was put together before Mr. Gates’ speeches, which he said appear to be the result of White House pressure on Mr. Gates to promote a defense-cutting agenda that could ultimately lead to a “hollowing out” of the U.S. military.
“If they have their way, the armed forces will be ever less capable of projecting power and the nation and its allies left increasingly open to blackmail, if not actual attack,” he said.
Brian Kennedy, head of the California-based Claremont Institute and a part of the coalition, said the initiative seeks to fill the void in strategic vision among American elites on the left and right of the political spectrum.
“The great concern during the Obama administration is that we will allow the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq to become strategic distractions with regards Russia and China,” Mr. Kennedy said.
The group’s founding statement says that “in a world characterized by growing threats to freedom and the U.S. Constitution, America’s exceptional role, and indeed our country’s very existence, is at risk.”
“We believe such times demand a robust, comprehensive national security posture appropriate to today’s threats, and tomorrow’s.”
The coalition’s full statement is to be published in Tuesday’s editions of The Washington Times.
The advocacy group has set 10 main defense and national security objectives, including renewed adherence to the philosophy that U.S. security is best maintained by having military forces that are fully trained, equipped and ready to deter and defeat enemies.
Other tenets call for strong nuclear forces, missile defenses and defenses for weapon of mass destruction attacks, as well as preserving U.S. sovereignty by opposing treaties, judicial rulings and other measures that weaken the Constitution and representative government.
It also calls for opposing Muslim efforts to impose Shariah law, which the group describes as “anti-Constitutional” and “totalitarian.”
“We call on elected officials, candidates for office and others who share these principles to join us in advancing them and, thereby, to restore the time-tested practice of promoting international peace through American strength,” the statement by the group said.
About the Author
Bill Gertz is a national security columnist for The Washington Times and senior editor at The Washington Free Beacon (www.freebeacon.com). He has been with The Times since 1985.
He is the author of six books, four of them national best-sellers. His latest book, “The Failure Factory,” on government bureaucracy and national security, was published in September 2008.
- Inside the Ring: Dispute between foreign minister, Republican guard commander in Iran
- Inside the Ring: China targets Global Hawk drone
- Inside the Ring: China targeting U.S. spy flights amid escalating tensions
- Inside the Ring: Tensions high during Joe Biden's Beijing visit
- Inside the Ring: U.S. funds China's nuclear security
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- Half of America strips religion from Christmas
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- NAPOLITANO: NSA spies pick up interference from the Constitution
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- 'Duck Dynasty' star Phil Robertson: Gays 'wont inherit the kingdom of God'
- John McCain to Harry Reid: Ill kick the crap out of you
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Nobody likes to talk about dying. But we can help.
A libertarian look at breaking news and political trends by author Tom Mullen.
Does it take over 25 years in public service to really know what goes on in Washington?
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow