- Obama takes aim at ‘corporate deserters’
- Dick’s Sporting Goods lays off 478 PGA golf pros
- Senators: Cease-fire must allow Israel to defend against rockets, tunnels
- Sierra Leone doctor fighting Ebola catches disease
- Iraq welcomes Russian fighter jets, helicopter gunships into ISIL fight
- John McCain laments: Obama’s ‘self-pity … is really kind of sad’
- GOP offer to fix VA gives $10 billion in emergency funds
- Paul Ryan offers to repair U.S. economic safety net with a single grant stream
- Kim Jong-un builds bond with Putin: $250M Russia-backed addition to key port opens
- Pope Francis meets Meriam Ibrahim, a Sudanese woman sentenced to death
Court backs in-state tuition rates for illegals
Question of the Day
The California Supreme Court ruled unanimously Monday that illegal immigrants attending state universities can continue to pay the cheaper, in-state tuition rates instead of the pricier rates charged to U.S. legal residents and citizens who live outside the state.
Justice Ming W. Chin said in the 28-page ruling that the 2002 state statute that grants in-state tuition rates to any student who attends a California high school for at least three years and graduates is not pre-empted by the 1996 federal law making illegal immigrants ineligible for the lower tuition.
The key, he said, is the wording of the federal law, which says in Section 1623 that illegal immigrants "shall not be eligible on the basis of residence within a state for postsecondary educational benefits."
"The fatal flaw in plaintiffs' argument concerning section 1623 is their contention that [the state] exemption from paying out-of-state tuition is based on residence. It is not," Justice Chin said in the opinion. "It is based on other criteria."
He said the wording of the federal statute, which says that illegal immigrants shall not be eligible for lower tuition "on the basis on residence within a state," provides states with wiggle room.
"If Congress had intended to prohibit states entirely from making unlawful immigrants ineligible for in-state tuition, it could have easily done so," said Mr. Chin. "It could simply have provided, for example, that 'an alien who is not lawfully present in the United States shall not be eligible.' But it did not do so. ... The reference to the benefit being on the basis of residence must have some meaning. It can only qualify, and thus limit, the prohibition's reach."
Michael Hethmon, general counsel for the Immigration Reform Law Institute, filed the lawsuit. He said his organization likely would appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court.
"We're obviously very disappointed because it was so clearly in our view a results-driven decision," Mr. Hethmon said. "They concede that this is what the California Legislature intended to do, and then conclude Congress was stupid because they wrote the law so you could find loopholes. They dismiss any argument about legislative intent."
California is one of 10 states that allow illegal immigrants to take advantage of in-state tuition waivers. The lawsuit, Martinez v. the Regents of the University of California, was filed on behalf of U.S. citizens who attend California public universities but reside outside the state and therefore must pay higher tuition.
The California law, known as Assembly Bill 540, became a campaign issue during the governor's race. Republican primary candidates Meg Whitman and Steve Poizner voiced opposition to lower tuition for illegal immigrants.
Attorney General Jerry Brown, who won the gubernatorial race and whose office defended the legislation before the court, released a statement Monday in support of the ruling. "The Martinez decision upholds California law, which was intended to encourage California high school graduates to attend public colleges and universities in the state," he said.
Thomas A. Saenz, president and general counsel of the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund, also applauded the high court's decision.
"The court's decision means that California's institutions of higher education will continue to be strengthened by the inclusion of some of our state's brightest and most successful students, who simply lack legal status due to the nation's failure to enact the widely supported DREAM Act," he said.
Congressional Democrats are pushing to bring the DREAM Act for a vote before the Republican House majority is seated in January.
The act would open a pathway to citizenship for illegal immigrants who attend college or enlist in the armed forces.
In California, an estimated 25,000 illegal immigrants take advantage of lower in-state tuition to attend school in the University of California, California State University and California Community Colleges systems. That's less than 1 percent of the total student body for those schools, according to data compiled by the Sacramento Bee. So-called "AB 540" students at California universities received $26 million in value from their tuition waivers in 2007-08, the Bee reported.
If the Martinez lawsuit succeeds, it could cost the state as much as $3 billion in reimbursements to U.S. students who were for lower tuition, Mr. Hethmon said.
Critics argue that benefits such as lower tuition provide yet more incentive for immigrants to enter the country illegally.
The California Supreme Court ruling "reflects the difference in attitudes on the bench and the attitudes of the public, which is one of the more disturbing things we see in the illegal-immigration debate," said Mr. Hethmon.
His organization has also filed a legal challenge to the Nebraska in-state tuition law.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Act would create tax-free savings accounts for the disabled
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Carson wins straw poll as conservatives focus on winning battle of ideas
- 'Carson for president' troops converge on Western Conservative Summit
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Evidence shows Russia firing artillery into Ukraine: Pentagon
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hamas rejects Kerry's call for cease-fire; Fears grow others could join fight against Israel
- Algerian plane diverted due to storms, second aircraft: 116 missing
- House panel OKs resolution to sue president for Obamacare delays
- Obama's empty tough-talk: Gun prosecutions plummet on his watch
- Norway expects imminent 'concrete threat' from ISIL terrorists 'within days'
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Obama says public not familiar enough with issues
- CARSON: Costco and the perils of mixing politics and business
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq