- House and Senate negotiators reach two-year budget deal
- Congress seeks ban on in-flight calls
- Michelle Malkin’s Twitchy site sold to owners of Townhall, HotAir: report
- GM’s Barra to be first woman to run top American carmaker
- China: Poisonous smog is a military asset, if you think about it
- Texas woman admits to sending ricin to Obama
- Ron Paul on son Rand: ‘I think he probably will’ run for president
- Cold War heats up again in the Arctic: Russian airfield reactivated after 20 years
- 6-year-old boy suspended for sexual harassment over kiss
- Voters deciding Mass. congressional contest
U.S. offers to delist Sudan as terrorism sponsor
Tied to south’s bid for freedom
The Obama administration has offered to take Sudan off a U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism if the Sudanese government holds a credible and on-time referendum on southern independence.
The Obama administration has taken a decision “to move up our readiness to rescind the designation of Sudan as a state sponsor of terrorism as early as July 2011,” a senior administration official said in a background briefing on Sunday.
Sudanese President Omar Bashir’s National Congress Party (NCP) has demanded for several years that Sudan be removed from the list.
Some leaders in the region also have suggested that taking this step would help persuade the Khartoum government to hold a credible referendum on Jan. 9, the date specified in the 2005 Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA).
The U.S. offer is subject to conditions. Khartoum must:
• Meet the CPA’s obligations to prepare for and conduct a transparent, on-time referendum.
• Respect the results of the referendum vote.
• Implement all post-referendum agreements, including those related to border demarcation, oil-revenue sharing, currency and citizenship.
“And we’ve also made very clear to the parties … that we will continue to monitor conduct as it relates to Darfur,” the U.S. official said, adding that the targeting of civilians, the denial of humanitarian access and the hindrance of African Union and U.N. peacekeepers will “reflect negatively on our abilities to carry out these steps.”
A second U.S. official, who also spoke on background, described the offer as “performance-based.”
Sen. John Kerry, Massachusetts Democrat and chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, conveyed the administration’s message in meetings with Sudanese leaders in Sudan over the weekend.
Mr. Kerry, who traveled to Sudan at President Obama’s request, met NCP officials and southern Sudanese leaders, including South Sudan President Salva Kiir and Vice President Ali Osman Taha.
Mr. Kerry said Sudan now has the opportunity to “define itself for the world and create a better, more peaceful, and more prosperous future for all the Sudanese people.”
“President Obama made clear in the proposal conveyed this weekend that if Sudan’s leaders take concrete steps to implement the Comprehensive Peace Agreement, including recognizing the results of the referendum in January, he is prepared to immediately take significant steps to begin to transform the bilateral relationship,” Mr. Kerry said. “This would be the beginning of a new road map for addressing key bilateral issues as post-referendum issues are resolved.”
Jonathan Temin, a senior program officer at the U.S. Institute of Peace, described the U.S. offer as an “important incentive.”
“It is a positive development if it compels the timely conduct of the referendum and the timely recognition of its results,” Mr. Temin said.
The Sudanese government has expressed its commitment to holding the referendum on Jan. 9; however, there is skepticism in the international community that it will be able to meet that deadline.
A second vote also is supposed to be held the same day to determine whether the residents of the oil-rich region of Abyei want to join the south if it secedes.
Officials from the north and south are still working out their differences on Abyei.
David Sullivan, research director at Enough, a project to end genocide and crimes against humanity, said the offer to accelerate the removal of Sudan from the list of state sponsors of terrorism “needs to be grounded in a comprehensive strategy that would normalize relations in exchange for peace across Sudan, both in Darfur and the South.”
On Nov. 1, Mr. Obama extended by a year sanctions against Sudan until Khartoum makes progress in resolving the humanitarian situation in its western province of Darfur. The sanctions are not affected by the administration’s offer to take Sudan off the terrorism list.
“Those … sanctions remain in place, and they are the ones that have a significant effect on Sudan’s economy and on the government of Sudan itself,” said a third U.S. official, who also spoke on the condition of anonymity.
Sudan was added to the U.S. list of state sponsors of terrorism in 1993 for harboring terrorists. At the time, Osama bin Laden and his al Qaeda network were based in Sudan.
In recent years, U.S. officials have described Sudan as a good partner in the global war on terrorism.
“There is a good deal of evidence to suggest that things have changed since the 1990s,” Mr. Temin said, adding that this has made it easier for the Obama administration to offer to take Sudan off the terrorism list.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.
- U.S. teacher shot dead in Benghazi after al Qaeda call for violence
- Syria nightmare: Fresh fears about al Qaeda fighters there returning home as sleeper terrorists
- Iran official: Sanctions 'utterly failed' to stop nuclear program
- China accuses Japan of raising tensions over new air defense zone
- Joe Biden meets Xi Jinping in China to try to defuse tensions on air defense zone
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- Harry Reid's visa pressure cooker
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- Israeli P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu backs out of Nelson Mandela funeral
- Galaxy S4 owner claims Samsung tried to silence him after phone caught fire
- Obama shakes hands with Cuba's Raul Castro at Nelson Mandela's funeral
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
A column dedicated to discussing politics, national security, civil liberties, and education.
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow