“While the Office of Inspector General has identified a number of factors that contributed to problems with the test-taking, nothing excuses the conduct of those who chose not to comply when instructions were clear.”
The FBI also said it was “disappointed with the misconduct described in the report,” but acknowledged some responsibility — saying it did not strictly limit how field offices administered the training and testing.
“While these issues explain some of the OIG’s findings, they do not excuse the conduct of employees who did not comply with clear instructions,” the statement said, adding that the FBI’s office of professional responsibility would “review and adjudicate the facts of cases involving misconduct and take all appropriate action.”
The guide, implemented Dec. 1, 2008, replaced several older sets of guidelines that separately addressed criminal investigations, national security investigations and foreign intelligence collection.
The 258-page document implements the attorney general’s guidelines for domestic FBI operations, the most recent version of which was issued in 2008 by Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey.
The Mukasey guidelines gave the FBI authority to open investigative “assessments” of U.S. citizens without any factual predicate or suspicion, including the authority to use intrusive techniques to surreptitiously collect information on people suspected of no wrongdoing and no connection with any foreign entity.
Shortly after the guide’s introduction, the FBI began comprehensive training on the new guide, including classroom study — after which FBI employees had to take and pass a computerized 51-question exam on the guide.
Written instructions given both before and during the exam specified that employees could use the guide and notes to take the exam, but they were not allowed to consult with other employees.
In addition, Question 51 required all employees to “certify that I only consulted the DIOG, notes or training aids but no other person while taking this exam.”
Because of concerns about cheating and assistance given during the exams, contrary to the representations made in response to Question 51, the inspector general's office initiated the investigation.
“The new DIOG is a fundamental document for ensuring that FBI investigations are conducted according to law and policy, and the FBI appropriately placed a high priority on ensuring that FBI personnel learned and understood the new guidelines through training and mandatory testing,” Mr. Fine said.
“Yet, a significant number of the FBI employees we interviewed cheated on the test and did not comply with the test conditions.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Jerry Seper is the investigative editor for The Washington Times.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall