- GOP hopes taking shutdown off the table with budget deal will pay dividends
- Chinese Death Star: The moon cited as the perfect launch pad for ballistic missiles
- Help wanted: Homeland Security plagued by vacancies at the top
- We are not amused: Queen’s protection officers warned to keep ‘sticky fingers’ off the royal cashews
- Unleash the crossbows: Gov. Scott Walker creates new hunting season
- Bubonic plague kills 20 in Madagascar
- G-20 diplomats fell for hacker attack promising nude photos of former French first lady Carla Bruni
- Minnesota guardsman charged with stealing private soldier data for fake IDs
- Florida appeals court rules universities can’t regulate guns
- Vladimir Putin defends Russian conservative values
GOP poised for big gains, political scientists say
Academic models foresee takeover
The Ivory Tower has weighed in on the chances that Republicans win back the House in November's elections, and the outlook is decidedly rosy for the GOP.
One set of professors says there is a 79 percent chance of Republicans taking the House and that the most likely outcome is that they will hold 229 seats in the 435-member chamber, while another professor using generic congressional polling projects a shift of 47 seats. Still another, using what he calls the "seats-in-trouble" prediction model, says Republicans are poised to capture 51 or 52 seats, giving them 230 or 231, well more than the 218 needed for control.
They were among the thousands of political science professors and students who descended on Washington over the past four days to hash out the thorny questions of academia.
Amid the debates over President Obama and the "tea party" movement, they put their statistical models to the test to see what history says will happen in November's election. Although history shows Republicans should be in for a good year, they say, it's uncertain how far that extends.
Professor Alfred G. Cuzan at the University of West Florida, whose model combines the history of past elections with rates of economic growth and inflation, said Republicans would come close to winning the House, but history shows swings of nearly 40 seats - the size needed to shift control - are hard to come by.
Mr. Cuzan, writing in a paper titled "Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010?" gave the GOP about a 40 percent chance and said it will depend "on some combination of random disturbances and systemic factors" that can't be accounted for in models, such as how deeply the country will rebel against Democrats' legislative agenda.
"Hence, the answer to this article's eponymous question is an emphatic maybe," he said.
But most models show Republicans cleaning up.
Dartmouth University's Joseph Bafumi said he expects Republicans to win about 53 percent of the total House vote. That would translate into 229 seats, or a pickup of 50.
His model combines a look at incumbents and open seats with generic polls. But he said this year's election could break the mold because the sides were already so divided that there may not be a late break toward the Republicans, as opposition parties have generally had, which could hold down GOP victories.
"From the start, the 2010 campaign has had a sharper ideological tone than in the past. The tilting toward the out-party may thus have been realized earlier than in the past," he wrote. "It also is possible that an unusually conservative Republican campaign could dampen the expected shift toward the Republicans. If either of these possibilities is true, and the polls remain unchanged through November, the Democrats actually could have the edge come Election Day."
Alan I. Abramowitz, a professor at Emory University, said November's vote historically is correlated to the September generic polls - when pollsters ask voters whether they would vote for an unnamed Democrat or an unnamed Republican in their congressional district.
He said that according to that, the GOP is poised for big gains: 47 House seats, seven governorships, 12 or 13 state legislative chambers and about four U.S. Senate seats - although he said that Senate number is too low.
James E. Campbell, a professor at the University of Buffalo, runs a seats-in-trouble model that looks at those districts where current officeholders are most vulnerable, based on political prognosticators' evaluations, and then figures out how much of a drag the president will be.
"The forecast is that Democrats will lose about 51 or 52 seats, leaving them with a total of 205 or 206 seats," Mr. Campbell concluded. "The odds appear to be quite favorable for the Republicans regaining the House majority that they lost in 2006."
Meanwhile, Larry J. Sabato, director of the University of Virginia's Center for Politics, looking at all the competitive races, said Republicans likely would net 47 House seats and are poised to win eight or nine Senate seats, leaving them just shy of the 10 needed for outright control of the chamber.
Mr. Sabato also said Democrats will lose a net of eight governorships and Republicans will gain control of eight to 12 legislative chambers.
"Many observers find it amazing that the less-liked party is on the verge of triumphing over the better-liked party," Mr. Sabato said in his analysis.
"Nevertheless, in the time-honored American way, voters will be inclined to punish the party in power by checking and balancing it with more members from the opposition party."
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Stephen Dinan can be reached at email@example.com.
- Federal deficit shrinks 20 percent in fiscal 2014
- Wind farms: Interior Department sacrifices eagle protection for alternative energy
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- Bipartisan House votes against 'patent trolls' who file lawsuits against innovators
- Bipartisan House votes to stop patent 'trolls'
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- NAPOLITANO: A conspiracy so vast
- Inside China: Ukraine gets nuke umbrella
- House votes for bargain to end budget drama
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro 'marriage'
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Somber duty: U.S. presidents in hot demand at Mandela's memorial
- MALCOLM/REIMER: Over-criminalization undermines respect for legal system
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Covering the world of soccer, including the World Cup, Major League Soccer, D.C. United and the English Premier League and other interesting sporting events.
Born in 1930 in rural Missouri, Charles Vandegriffe, Sr., brings his time and place to the Communities.
Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow