- New Mexico decides to use HealthCare.gov for 2015
- Satanists to use Hobby Lobby rule to skirt state abortion laws
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- HHS: ‘Donut hole’ reforms saved Medicare enrollees $11.5 billion since 2010
- Boston-area tornado rips 100 homes: ‘Are we in Kansas?’
- Rush Limbaugh: ‘There is no journalism anymore’
- Scott Brown struggles for political traction in New Hampshire Senate race
- California’s Jerry Brown cites God, ‘religious call’ to embrace illegals
- Hamid Karzai’s cousin killed by suicide bomber at Eid al-Fitr party
- Obama thanks Muslims for ‘building the very fabric of our nation’
Budget hawks may not turn a blind eye to Pentagon
Question of the Day
Despite a near-consensus on Capitol Hill on the need to cut spending, about a fifth of the federal budget has been placed entirely off limits: the Defense Department, which is so awash in cash that even its auditors have a tough time telling where all the money is going.
For lawmakers brave enough to broach the topic, the Pentagon, whose spending has gone from $300 billion in 2000 to more than $663 billion in 2010, is an obvious target. The defense budget is the single largest spending item over which Congress has direct annual control, and the department has never complied with federal rules requiring annual audits.
Some fiscal hawks say it is time for a change.
“At a minimum, we need to freeze defense spending until the Pentagon can audit its books,” said Sen. Tom Coburn, Oklahoma Republican. “Our military leaders have said our debt is our greatest national security threat. In order to defeat that threat, we have to put everything on the table, including defense spending that, in some cases, does nothing to defend our nation.”
Still, proposals to slice the department’s spending have been few and far between, and the ones that lawmakers have put forward have gained little traction.
In the debate over cutting 2011 spending levels, military spending has basically been AWOL, while the competing 2012 budget blueprints rolled out by President Obama and House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, Wisconsin Republican, include billions of additional dollars for defense, though at a reduced rate of growth. Lawmakers, meanwhile, are proposing deep cuts to the other federal agencies, which, unlike the Pentagon, conform to the audit guidelines.
Lawmakers and fiscal conservatives say auditors can’t get a clear picture of the Defense Department’s books because it operates on outdated networks and systems that make it impossible to track where the money is going.
“Congress does not know how the Pentagon spends money, and the Pentagon does not know how the Pentagon spends its money,” said Winslow T. Wheeler, a military analyst at the Center for Defense Information who worked on national security issues for 31 years for members of the U.S. Senate. “It is not that DOD annually flunks audits, it is the fact that it can’t be audited.”
He added, “If you flunk an audit, you can track the money and find that it was not spent as intended. If you can’t be audited, you can’t track the money. In other words, it is literally true that it would be a vast improvement if DOD were to flunk an audit.”
In testimony before Congress this year, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said his department understands the need to comply with federal standards and is working hard to get its accounting systems up to snuff. Until then, he said, the department will rely on long-held systems “that give me confidence that we know where the money is going.”
“The reality is we do have systems in place to deal with fraud, to deal with other issues and that provide us with the tools do to financial management and budgeting,” he said.
Mr. Gates also has won praise from both major parties for finding $100 billion in savings and $78 billion in cuts to projected spending increases over the next five years.
Despite the proposed savings, however, questions over how the Pentagon spends its money have added a layer of uncertainty to the spending debate.
Last week, lawmakers appeared perplexed after Mr. Gates assured them that the department could absorb the initial $550 million tab from the recent military strikes on Libya and the estimated $40-million-a-month bill from ongoing operations - but he couldn’t tell them where he had found the additional money.
Rep. J. Randy Forbes, Virginia Republican who sits on the House Armed Services Committee, said he was left scratching his head about the source of the funds.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Achin' for Akin: Democrats praying for GOP Gaffes in midterms
- GOP 2014: Republican governors cite their economic stewardship
- Perdue, Nunn square off in race for Georgia's open Senate seat
- Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff locked in dead heat
- David Perdue defeats Jack Kingston in Georgia Republican Senate primary runoff
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Border surge puts Obama legacy on immigration at stake
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- White House: No choice but to act now on climate change
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq