Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta on Tuesday rejected calls for the United States to throttle back the aggressive military campaign of drone strikes against al Qaeda and other targeted terrorists in Pakistan’s tribal areas, in response to criticism of the strikes by a retired head of U.S. intelligence.
“We’re protecting our national security,” Mr. Panetta told an audience at the National Defense University. “We’re defending our country.”
“We are going after those who continue to plan to attack this country. They’re terrorists. And the operations that we’ve conducted there have been very effective at undermining al Qaeda and their ability to plan those kinds of attacks,” Mr. Panetta said.
U.S. officials generally do not publicly acknowledge the campaign of drone strikes, which are covert operations run by the CIA. The military also uses armed drones, such as in Libya, but the strikes in Pakistan are carried out under intelligence authorities.
Retired Adm. Dennis C. Blair, former U.S. director of national intelligence, said in an opinion piece in the New York Times over the weekend that the drone strikes, though they had been effective in the past at decimating al Qaeda’s leadership, had become counterproductive and were undermining support for the United States and its war on terrorism.
“As the drone campaign wears on, hatred of America is increasing in Pakistan,” where “news media accounts of heavy civilian casualties are widely believed,” he added.
In May, U.S. officials said about 180 drone attacks had been carried out since early 2009, killing about 1,200 militants and 30 noncombatants. Since the summer of 2010, the officials claimed a perfect track record of zero civilian deaths, but even many supporters are skeptical of that. Verification of casualties and targeting is difficult because reporters are barred from the lawless tribal regions.
Last week, the Bureau of Investigative Journalism, a nonprofit based at London’s City University, published a report based on interviews in the tribal areas and an analysis of press reporting. They concluded that more than 385 civilians, including 160 children, were among the 2,292 fatalities in U.S. drone attacks in Pakistan since 2004.
“Those that are suggesting somehow that this is a good time to pull back are wrong,” he said. “This is a good time to keep putting the pressure on, to make sure that we really do undermine their ability to conduct any kind of attacks on this country.”
Addressing fractious and controversial U.S.-Pakistani ties, Mr. Panetta lightly remarked that it is “complicated.” But he quickly turned serious.
“What makes this complicated is that [Pakistani government officials] have relationships with the Haqqanis,” he said, referring to one of the extremist groups based in Pakistan and active in the Afghan insurgency. “There’s a relationship with LeT,” he added, referring to Lashkar-e-Taiba, a Kashmir-based extremist group long supported by Pakistani intelligence.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, appearing with Mr. Panetta, reiterated the U.S. view that Pakistan’s relationship with extremist groups was changing. “There is a debate going on inside Pakistan about the best way to deal with what is an increasing internal threat,” she said.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
What does the middle-class conservative think about everything? Find out here.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall