- Arkansas voter ID law struck down by state judge
- FDA proposes ban on e-cigarette sales to minors
- Bad omen? Italian man crushed to death by John Paul II crucifix
- Company stopped from accepting abortion waste
- Girl surprises Michelle Obama with unemployed dad’s resume
- ‘Harry Potter’ religion class seeks to enlighten students on ‘God, sin, and theodicy’
- ‘Optionally piloted’ Black Hawk helicopter clears tests; future missions to go ‘fully unmanned’
- Vice News reporter kidnapped in Ukraine is freed after being beaten, blindfolded
- FCC’s new ‘net neutrality’ proposal sparks outrage among consumer advocates
- Families of ferry’s lost confront South Korean officials
Feds’ role in schools re-emerges as 2012 issue
Duncan pushes back as Republican hopefuls target federal department
Republican presidential candidates are increasingly using the federal Department of Education as a punching bag, citing it as yet another example of big government’s heavy hand in local affairs.
But this time, the Education Department is punching back.
In what could be a preview of things to come, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and Education Secretary Arne Duncan traded harsh words last week and helped push education and the federal government’s role in it from its usual spot on the back burner to the spotlight of presidential politics.
During an Aug. 15 campaign stop in Iowa, Mr. Perry said he doesn’t “think the federal government has a role in education.” A few days later, Mr. Duncan shot back, telling the Bloomberg news agency he feels “very, very badly” for the students of Texas, a rare example of the education secretary using his pulpit to take political shots at Republicans.
As the 2012 campaign heats up, analysts think those types of exchanges could become more common and think that education policy could play a much greater role than in recent elections.
Some Republicans are forcing the issue to the forefront by resurrecting a plank of the party platform buried for the past decade: abolish the Department of Education.
“In the last couple of presidential races, education did not come to the forefront as a major issue … but the Republicans have just come off two years of attacking President Obama on health care. [Education] will fit their theme by saying this is another area where Obama wants the federal government to be too active,” said Jack Jennings, president and CEO of the Center on Education Policy, a D.C.-based advocacy group. Mr. Jennings is also former general counsel for the House Education Committee.
Education “is traditionally more of an issue that is discussed, but it doesn’t reach the top tier. This time, it’s possible that it can, because there seems to be more of a clear difference between the parties,” he said.
Mr. Perry isn’t the only candidate to put the Education Department in his political cross hairs. Rep. Michele Bachmann, Minnesota Republican and tea party favorite, has made similar calls to end the federal government’s control over schools. Rep. Ron Paul, Texas Republican, supports shuttering the department.
In 2010, Republicans such as Rand Paul of Kentucky and Mike Lee of Utah called for eliminating the department during their successful Senate campaigns.
Just 15 years ago, the party’s platform called for an end to the federal role in education. That began to change with the campaign of George W. Bush, who in his first major initiative as president joined such liberal Democrats as Sen. Edward M. Kennedy to implement No Child Left Behind, a sweeping education-policy overhaul with heavy federal involvement
By 2008, the Republican platform merely called for “a review of Department of Education programs and administration to identify and eliminate ineffective programs, to respect the role of the states and to better meet state needs.”
Analysts think Republicans are returning to the pre-Bush administration platform for two reasons: first, they see gutting the Education Department or eliminating it altogether as a reasonable way to slash billions of dollars from the budget at a time of exploding national debt.
Second, conservatives lump the department in with health care reform, increased environmental regulations and other Obama administration steps to vastly expand federal power, said Mark Rom, associate professor at Georgetown University’s Public Policy Institute.
“The attack on education falls in with a whole wish list of the tea party to make the federal government as small and inconsequential as possible,” he said. “It’s no special hatred of education.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama uses naturalization ceremony in South Korea to push immigration reform
- In Japan, Obama plays soccer with a robot and warns students of climate change
- Running on empty: EPA slashes biofuel goals because of ethanol shortage
- Ukraine claims torture by pro-Russian forces on the heels of Biden's stern warning to Moscow
- Joe Biden to Ukrainian lawmakers: Tackle 'cancer of corruption'
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Only IRS employees could expect rewards for failing to pay their taxes
- Holder cancels appearance in OKC amid angry protests
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- In its hunt for Senate, Republican candidates campaign against Harry Reid
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obamacare class-action suit opens a new legal front
- Sold out: Ukraine's leadership swapped best military weapons for cash
- Justice at last: 'Evil woman' outed for grabbing girl's game ball
- Gun control supporters send message to NRA
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Nevada rancher's racial remarks cost him range of support
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Celebrity deaths in 2014