- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
- John Boehner says GOP should support gay candidates: ‘I do’
- Grass-Whopper: Pan-fried cricket burgers go over big in New York City
U.S. cites ‘misunderstanding’ in deadly Pakistan operation
Pakistani official challenges report
Question of the Day
The U.S. military on Thursday acknowledged serious mistakes in a cross-border operation last month that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers and strained ties with the South Asian nation, but said U.S. forces had acted in self-defense.
An investigation into the Nov. 26 incident in Pakistan’s Mohmand area concluded that inadequate coordination between U.S. and Pakistani officers, and reliance on incorrect map coordinates resulted in a “misunderstanding,” the Pentagon said in a statement.
Air ForceBrig. Gen. Stephen A. Clark, who led the investigation into the incident, found that there was no intentional effort to target Pakistani troops or to provide inaccurate coordinates to the Pakistanis.
He also found that U.S. forces “acted in self-defense and with appropriate force after being fired upon,” the Pentagon said.
The two Pakistani military outposts were located atop a barren ridgeline.
U.S. ground troops operating in the area came under direct, heavy machine-gun fire that they determined was coming from the ridgeline and then called in air support, Gen. Clark told reporters at the Pentagon via teleconference.
Pakistani officials have denied that Pakistani troops fired first or that there was hostile fire in the area before the NATO assault.
A Pakistani official told The Washington Times on Thursday that the report’s conclusion that U.S. troops were responding to hostile fire is false.
“On our part, we are clear and sure of what happened on that evening,” said the Pakistani official, who spoke on background citing the sensitive nature of the subject.
“What the report concludes contradicts our position,” the official added.
The incident drew a sharp response from the Pakistani government. Pakistan shut down NATO’s supply lines into Afghanistan, kicked the U.S. out of an air base from where drone strikes were launched against terror suspects, and boycotted a conference on Afghanistan reconstruction in Bonn earlier this month.
Pakistani officials gave detailed briefings to reporters in Islamabad and Washington on their version of the incident, saying NATO forces deliberately attacked the two Pakistani army posts and ignored rules of cooperation.
A Pakistani official, who briefed reporters on background last week, said the Pakistani military in September had cleared all terrorists from the area where the incident took place.
The two military outposts are located atop a barren ridge, which terrorists would not use as a hideout, he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ashish Kumar Sen is a reporter covering foreign policy and international developments for The Washington Times.
Prior to joining The Times, Mr. Sen worked for publications in Asia and the Middle East. His work has appeared in a number of publications and online news sites including the British Broadcasting Corp., Asia Times Online and Outlook magazine.
- U.S. teacher shot dead in Benghazi after al Qaeda call for violence
- Syria nightmare: Fresh fears about al Qaeda fighters there returning home as sleeper terrorists
- Iran official: Sanctions 'utterly failed' to stop nuclear program
- China accuses Japan of raising tensions over new air defense zone
- Joe Biden meets Xi Jinping in China to try to defuse tensions on air defense zone
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- Bradley Manning, as Chelsea Manning, pens thank-you to MLK from prison
- Activists urge Obama to go rogue, sidestep Congress
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- NAPOLITANO: Pope Francis should be saving souls, not pocketbooks
- Kill team: Obama war chiefs widen drone death zones
- Pope Franciss colorful past: Gods nightclub bouncer
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- MOVIE REVIEW: 'Out of the Furnace'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!