- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
- HAYDEN: Intelligence, evidence and the case against Russia
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: ‘Playing defense on the one-yard line’
- Activists vow to occupy fast-food restaurants to get higher pay
EDITORIAL: The czar who bleeds
Putin loses popularity but is poised to regain Russian presidency
Question of the Day
Prime Minister Vladimir Putin suffered a setback last weekend on his march to resume the Russian presidency. The weak showing for his United Russia party in Sunday’s parliamentary elections raised questions whether his return to high executive office will be as smooth as expected.
Mr. Putin’s party could only muster around 50 percent of the vote, down from 64 percent in 2007. This translates into a loss of 77 seats in the Duma, and with them his party’s 70 percent supermajority. Granted, the opposition does not pose a serious challenge in parliament. The rest of the vote was fractured between various opposition movements, with the second-place Communist Party netting just under 20 percent of the vote. There are enough smaller parties aligned with United Russia to prevent legislative gridlock, but as Russian President Dmitri Medvedev noted at a post election rally, “That’s parliamentarianism.”
Foreign observers and local poll watchers documented the most brazen forms of electoral fraud. The election saw allegations of ballot-box stuffing, intimidation at polling places, bribery and cyber-attacks on election watchdogs. Communist leader Gennadi A. Zyuganov called the elections “unprecedented in their filth, pressure and falsification.” Even our own secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton, voiced “serious concerns” about the conduct of the election, saying, “Russian voters deserve a full investigation of all credible reports of electoral fraud and manipulation, and we hope in particular that then Russian authorities will take action on reports that come forward.”
Some irregularities stood out, such as the 99.5 percent vote for United Russia in Chechnya. Any such lopsided vote raises questions, and in this case, Mr. Putin oversaw a brutal war against separatist rebels in Chechnya during his first term. It’s hard to believe the Chechen people are so overwhelmingly grateful to the “butcher of Grozny.”
The surprise in the Sixth State Duma elections wasn’t that the vote was rigged, but that it was not rigged well. Over the past 11 years, observers became accustomed to thinking of Mr. Putin as a figure without peer in Russia: dominant, manipulative and relentless. Wealthy oligarchs who fell afoul of his government wound up in jail. Street demonstrators against his rule were hustled off in police vans. Investigative journalists who made too many inquiries turned up dead. Surely the former KGB agent who presided over Russia with such certainty, clarity and ruthlessness could see to it that he wasn’t embarrassed by something so pro forma as an election.
The presidential election is scheduled for March 2012, and Mr. Putin already has said he expects it to be “dirty.” His only declared opponent thus far is Mr. Zyuganov, who has little chance of winning even in a fair election. Mr. Putin can point to solid achievements in his first two terms from 2000-2008, including strong economic growth, a 13 percent flat tax, imposing domestic order and restoring Russian influence in world affairs. Sunday’s results, however, show that many Russians are simply tired of Mr. Putin. They have no clear alternative, but they know they don’t want him.
It’s unlikely that a new champion will emerge sometime in the next three months, and Mr. Putin is likely to regain the presidency. Whether he will maintain his legitimacy is another question.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Trump-Carson a 2016 dream ticket
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama fundraises as the world burns
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: No U.S. support for Christian peril
- EDITORIAL: Gun-shy Obama
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Second- and third-stringers eye 2016 if front-runner stumbles
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Russia shipping sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine separatists
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Michelle Obama says money in politics is bad, asks donors for 'big, fat check'
- EDITORIAL: Detroit's water 'spigot bigots'
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is 'torture'
- Brian Kelly, Notre Dame ready for different route to title
- White House readies for House GOP impeachment push: 'Foolish' to ignore
- Presidents of Honduras, Guatemala blame U.S. for border children crisis