- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
EDITORIAL: Obama’s Mideast indignity
Syrian brutality calls attention to White House weakness
Question of the Day
President Obama’s “lead from behind” strategy for dealing with the rolling crisis in the Middle East has claimed more victims. On Saturday, Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s forces shelled Jisr al-Shughour, burned its fields and rolled into the city center on tanks. The White House responded with a statement that the Syrian government had created a “humanitarian crisis” and that unless it gave “immediate and unfettered access” to the Red Cross, it would “once again be showing contempt for the dignity of the Syrian people.” The Damascus regime was unmoved.
Mr. Obama uses the word “dignity” in almost every speech he gives, but it has no persuasive power when it comes to dictators whose existence is an affront to the concept. Mr. Assad’s approach to the leader of the most powerful country in the world has been to ignore him. In his May 19 Middle East policy speech, Mr. Obama delivered what was widely described as a “stern warning” to Mr. Assad: “The Syrian people have shown their courage in demanding a transition to democracy. President Assad now has a choice: He can lead that transition or get out of the way.” Mr. Assad rejected Mr. Obama’s proposed dichotomy and chose a third path, ramping up the violence and daring America to do anything about it.
Mr. Assad’s thugs have killed more civilians than Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi did before the United States began its bombing campaign against him, and comparisons to Libya are hard to avoid. Back on March 3, Mr. Obama said, “The violence must stop; Moammar Gadhafi has lost the legitimacy to lead, and he must leave; those who perpetrate violence against the Libyan people will be held accountable; and the aspirations of the Libyan people for freedom, democracy and dignity must be met.” The same could be said about Syria. On March 19, as U.S. forces intervened, Mr. Obama couched the action as “part of a coalition that includes close allies and partners who are prepared to meet their responsibility to protect the people of Libya and uphold the mandate of the international community.” This was the first and probably last invocation of the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine.
When asked on Monday about the difference between Mr. Assad’s murderous rampage and Col. Gadhafi’s, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the circumstances were different. “There was a united call for action in Libya,” he explained. “As you know, we had a United Nations mandate.” There is no such mandate in Syria, which puts the Obama administration in the uncomfortable position of defending the implicit veto power he has given this group over the United States acting in its national interest, or defending the helpless people Mr. Obama has encouraged to rise up against brutal regimes.
The crisis in Syria reveals a White House strategy that is conceptually disconnected and ineffective. The lesson of the “Arab Spring” to Middle Eastern autocrats is to send in the tanks and let Mr. Obama worry about dignity.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reject any legislation dubbed 'comprehensive'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Media are complicit in Hamas' tactics
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gazans should help defeat Hamas
- EDITORIAL: The impeachment trap
- EDITORIAL: Illegal aliens in the shadows? What shadows?
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- McCLAUGHRY: Finish off the "Islamic State" quickly and cheaply
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- HUSAIN: Fleeing Iraqi Christians find safe haven at the Shrine of Imam Ali
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine