Funds for D.C.’s needy go elsewhere
A D.C. Council member who represents some of the city’s poorest households has spent less than 5 percent of the money she has raised since 2007 to help constituents with urgent needs, such as funeral expenses, rent and utilities, a review of campaign finance records shows.
Yvette Alexander, Ward 7 Democrat who sponsored a 2009 bill to double the amount council members can raise for their constituent services fund, has spent the bulk of the money she raised from businesses, labor unions, lobbyists and others on catering, consultants, advertising and supplies for community events and fundraisers, the records show.
And unlike many of her colleagues, Ms. Alexander has declined to provide receipts or invoices that would justify thousands of dollars in recent expenditures from the fund.
Ms. Alexander has raised more than $120,000 for constituent services over the past three years, according to quarterly reports she is required to file with the Office of Campaign Finance (OCF). Of that total, records show she spent more than $69,000 — at least 57 percent — on consultants and events.
Her reports further show that her office spent in excess of $44,000 — at least 36 percent — on rent, telephone service, utilities, computer expenses and equipment to maintain a privately leased office that she also used for a campaign office on Pennsylvania Avenue Southeast. Ms. Alexander is the only member to have leased office space with constituent service funds, despite a law that requires the city to provide rent-free space to council members for such purposes.
Past-due rent of an unspecified amount and an unpaid telephone bill totaling $5,388 forced her to shutter that office last month, as The Washington Times recently reported, while she relocates to a nearby office in a D.C. government building.
Of the remaining funds, bank fees, petty cash and postage accounted for roughly $2,700, with more than $3,700 — just 3 percent of the total funds raised — described on her reports as “other.” Among expenditures labeled “other” are a $200 payment to a funeral home, a $172 payment to a florist and a handful of unspecified payments to Ward 7 residents.
Those figures are out of step with Ms. Alexanders colleagues on the council.
For instance, Chairman Kwame R. Brown’s quarterly reports show fewer expenditures for catering, consultants and fundraisers, and more expenditures labeled “other,” though the latter category frequently went to people in need.
Ward 5 Democrat Harry L. Thomas Jr.s use of his constituent services fund mirrors Ms. Alexander’s in terms of catering, fundraisers and community events, but his quarterly reports also show only a few consultants and numerous entries for residents, recreation centers and churches.
Muriel Bowser, Ward 4 Democrat, spent less on catering and lists dozens of expenditures for fundraisers, but she also lists numerous expenditures for in-kind donations to people and organizations in need.
“Based on your expenditure report, it is not clear how the residents are benefiting from this program,” wrote Jackie Pinckney-Hackett, a Ward 7 activist and former director of the D.C. school system’s Office of Parent and Community Involvement, in a recent e-mail to Ms. Alexander. “This concerns us greatly.”
Residents and community leaders also are becoming frustrated that Ms. Alexander has refused to disclose details about her constituent expenditures or delinquent bills at her office space, which she leased from D.C. developer and former Ward 7 council member H.R. Crawford.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.