- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
EDITORIAL: Natural gas pains
Congress shouldn’t pump up an already competitive fuel
Question of the Day
America’s energy woes show what’s wrong when politicians intervene in the market. When government tilts the playing field to favor an industry, rivals want their own slice of the pie. As gasoline prices skyrocket, natural-gas backers sense an opportunity to grab a larger share of the fuel market and want lawmakers to climb aboard the “green” fuel express.
Exhibit A is the New Alternative Transportation to Give Americans Solutions Act, or NAT GAS Act. H.R. 1380 would give tax credits ranging from $7,000 for buyers of natural-gas-fueled autos to $64,000 for buyers of such trucks. Manufacturers would be eligible for a credit of $10,000 for each vehicle they build. Natural-gas producers would get a 50-cent-a-gallon tax credit, and station owners would get tax breaks when they install pumping equipment.
Natural gas offers some benefits. It’s clean, producing 30 percent lower emissions than gasoline; it’s abundant, with deposits large enough to last 100 years; and it can be cheaper than gasoline. It makes no sense for Congress to favor natural gas when it’s already a competitive product. That’s the view of Rep. Mike Pompeo, Kansas Republican, and Rep. Raul R. Labrador, Idaho Republican, who say the bill is “the perfect example of a federal policy that’s trying to identify and select a winner.” Energy heavyweights Charles and David Koch voiced agreement Friday that conservatives should oppose subsidies that distort markets, prompting a retort from oil and gas tycoon T. Boone Pickens, who backs the measure.
While favoritism in energy policy is nothing new, the cumulative effects of energy-market distortion have littered the headlines in recent years. Using corn for ethanol production has helped escalate food prices, up 36 percent globally this year. Tax credits for solar panels have stimulated the industry in low-cost China, driving manufacturers out of business in America. Much of the $3 billion from the “cash for clunkers” program wound up in the pockets of Japanese and Korean automakers. Massachusetts’ Cape Wind project has put Bay State utilities on the hook for pricey offshore wind-farm electricity.
Worst of all is President Obama’s chokehold on fossil fuels. By squeezing off oil drilling, he has driven up gasoline to $4 a gallon, cutting into the economic recovery and threatening the nation with a second recession. Democrats who believe fairness requires an end to tax breaks for the oil industry must admit it also means Mr. Obama should take his foot off the industry’s neck.
Rather than worsen market distortion with favors for natural gas, lawmakers should join in a bipartisan move to let the collective wisdom of tens of millions of consumers select the best energy products.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- EDITORIAL: Stopping police asset-forfeiture predators
- EDITORIAL: Obama's 'economic patriotism' means higher taxes
- EDITORIAL: Cellphones, steering wheels and safety
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ship tours can foster dialogue
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Latin leaders profit from illegals
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- DCCC raising money on suggestion Obama impeachment is imminent
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Ohio university quiz implies atheists are naturally smarter than Christians
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Federal judge rules D.C. ban on handguns in public is unconstitutional