- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Virginia redistricting lawsuit hints of state Senate rifts ahead
Question of the Day
A lawsuit filed over congressional redistricting in Virginia suggests likely partisan sniping in the state’s upcoming General Assembly session, with Democrats already contesting Republican claims to a Senate majority.
The lawsuit, filed last week in U.S. District Court for the Eastern Division of Virginia in Alexandria, calls for a three-judge panel to draw new lines for Virginia’s 11 congressional districts, as state House and Senate leaders remain deadlocked over the issue.
“What would have been preferable and favorable is for the General Assembly to accomplish that task,” said state Sen. A. Donald McEachin, Henrico Democrat and newly elected caucus chairman. “Regrettably, the House had to say, ‘Our way or the highway’ and force this matter into the courts.”
House Speaker William J. Howell disagrees.
“We tried to call the Democrats and have them come back prior to the [November] election, [but] they didn’t seem to want to do it,” said Mr. Howell, Stafford Republican, when he announced that the redistricting process would wait until next year.
The Republican-controlled House is pushing a plan that would largely keep intact the districts of the state’s 11 congressional incumbents, which critics are calling an “incumbent-protection plan” to help preserve the GOP’s 8-3 majority.
Additional wrangling is expected as a result of the November elections that willput 20 Democrats and 20 Republicans in the Virginia Senate — with Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling holding the crucial, tiebreaking vote.
The Senate Democrats’ plan creates a second “minority-opportunity” district by decreasing the eligible black voting population to less than 50 percent in Democratic Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott’s 3rd District.
The population in Rep. J. Randy Forbes‘ southeastern 4th District would in turn increase from about 33 percent to slightly more than 50 percent and become the state’s sole majority-minority district.
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit include residents from congressional districts 1, 4, 7, 10, and 11, which have become “overpopulated” relative to others based on 2010 census figures. The lawsuit argues they will be deprived of their constitutional rights if the current lines stay in place.
J. Gerald Hebert, one of the attorneys representing the plaintiffs, has worked for both state and national Democrats. But he says the suit is not affiliated with any of the congressional incumbents, Virginia senators or the state Democratic Party.
But the pre-emptive salvo isn’t entirely nonpartisan, said Quentin Kidd, a Christopher Newport University professor who helped spearhead a redistricting map-drawing competition for college students this year.
“In some ways, it’s kind of a lawsuit in my mind to contend the [notion] of the Republican-controlled General Assembly,” he said.
Regardless of who’s filing the suit, it’s designed to tip the scales toward the Democrats’ redistricting plan, he added, since in theory, the General Assembly could just pass the House plan once the regular session begins in January. Republicans control the House, and Mr. Bolling’s vote would give the GOP the edge in the Senate.
But exactly what a lieutenant governor can vote on, and when, is under intense scrutiny from both parties.
Mr. Bolling’s office says it’s relying on a legal opinion issued in the 1990s by A.E. Dick Howard, who oversaw the rewriting of the modern state Constitution in 1971.
That opinion affirms the office’s power to break ties on procedural matters, as well as appropriations, budget bills and general bond obligations.
“It’s a question of fairness,” said Senate Majority Leader Richard L. Saslaw, Fairfax Democrat. “The Republicans are trying to overrule the will of the people and claim a majority they did not earn.”
Said Mr. McEachin: “The constitution of Virginia is very clear. The organization of the Senate is the prerogative of the elected members of the Senate, and Lt. Gov. Bolling is not a member of the Senate.”
Mr. Bolling says the constitution “clearly provides” that the lieutenant governor can cast the tiebreaking vote, and that nothing in the constitution prevents him from voting on organizational issues, such as the crucial task of determining the makeup of committees.
Republicans “earned the right” to serve in the majority based on the 2011 elections and the 2009 election for lieutenant governor, added incoming Senate Majority Leader Thomas K. Norment Jr., James City Republican.
“I find it disappointing that now the leaders of the Senate Democratic caucus have decided to argue over the results,” he said.
While Mr. Bolling has the authority to break ties, a majority of the Senate is required for a quorum to do business, which could give Democrats the opportunity to put a wrench in GOP plans if they simply walk out.
“I think all options that are available to our caucus ought to be explored,” said Mr. McEachin, adding that the particular tactic might change based on the issue at hand.
“We’re looking into it,” Mr. Saslaw said. “That’s all I can say at this point. We’re looking into it.”
Said Mr. Kidd: “Both sides have the recipe for disaster in their cookbooks. It’s just a question of whether they decide to cook it up.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Actress Glenn Close, advocacy groups prod Congress on mental health legislation
- Virginia conservative offers solution to bureaucratic nightmare regarding concealed weapons
- House retirements creating pickup opportunities for Democrats and Republicans
- Senate confirms Obama pick Jeh Johnson as Homeland Security secretary
- 75 is the new old: VA DMV study recommends fitness tests for aging drivers
Latest Blog Entries
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling sentence disparities unfair, Obama pardons 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- Outrage over Phil Robertson suspension, 'malignant' political correctness
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
Wall Street news for retail investors who want to know what's going on.
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow