- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
- Hillary: ‘Dead broke’ comment was ‘inartful,’ but insists it was ‘accurate’
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional
- As fighting in Gaza rages on, Kerry battles hapless bumbler perception
Sham entry of Hispanic could sway Ariz. vote
Question of the Day
The author of Arizona’s landmark immigration law is facing a recall election that’s as wild and unpredictable as the state’s southern border.
Arizona Senate President Russell Pearce is fighting for his political life against foes of Senate Bill 1070, the tough immigration enforcement legislation he sponsored in 2010. He faces a formidable opponent in charter-school executive Jerry Lewis, who, like Mr. Pearce, is a Mormon Republican in a GOP district dominated by conservative Mormons.
But it’s a little-known immigrant from Veracruz, Mexico, who may decide the outcome of the Nov. 8 election.
Olivia Cortes, a retiree, entered the race with little fanfare, but withdrew Oct. 6 after a judge ruled that she was a sham candidate put up by Pearce supporters in hopes of siphoning votes from Mr. Lewis. Even so, her name will appear on the ballots because they were printed before her withdrawal.
Her departure means Ms. Cortes cannot serve as the senator from the Mesa-based legislative district even if she receives the most votes, but analysts say she’s still likely draw a small percentage of the balloting from voters who either don’t realize she’s no longer running or don’t like the other two candidates.
In a race that could be decided by a few hundred votes, Ms. Cortes‘ non-candidacy may well make the difference, said Arizona political consultant Jason Rose.
“She could have gotten 7 to 9 percent [if she had stayed in the race]; now she could get 2 to 3 percent,” said Mr. Rose. “In almost any scenario, a vote for Olivia Cortes is a vote for Russell Pearce. Despite the bad optics and bad choreography, it’s still an effective potential tactic.”
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Edward Burke ruled Oct. 3 there is evidence the Cortes candidacy was being directed by Pearce supporters, notably Greg Western, chairman of the East Valley Tea Party and a Pearce ally. Two of Mr. Pearce’s nieces helped collect signatures for her campaign and were accompanied by their father, Justice of the Peace Lester Pearce, according to testimony.
“The court finds that Pearce supporters recruited Cortes, a political neophyte, to run in the recall election to siphon Hispanic votes from Lewis to advance Pearce’s recall election bid,” the judge said in his decision.
At the same time, the judge ruled that Ms. Cortes had done nothing wrong and could remain on the ballot. However, citing the “constant intimidation and harassment” of her family and neighbors, she dropped out a few days later.
The episode delivered a public relations blow to the Pearce campaign, despite Mr. Pearce’s insistence that he had never met Ms. Cortes, which she confirmed. The liberal Phoenix New Times called it “one of the sleaziest acts of voter manipulation we’ve ever seen.”
Even so, Lewis campaign co-chairman John Giles said he fears the Cortes non-candidacy will serve its purpose. Mr. Giles said internal campaign polling shows Ms. Cortes still receiving support from a small but significant segment of the electorate.
“Unfortunately, it’s going to accomplish its goal because the ballots aren’t going to be reprinted. There will be some signage in the polling places, but that’s going to be inadequate,” said Mr. Giles. “In the polling we’ve done, some people are still voting for Olivia Cortes.”
Pearce supporters say Ms. Cortes‘ brief entry wasn’t the only artificial tactic in the race. After gathering enough signatures to force the recall, foes of Mr. Pearce actively sought a Mormon Republican candidate and discouraged Democrats from running for office in order to increase their chances of success.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Valerie Richardson covers politics and the West from Denver. She can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Westerners call for oversight to combat federal land managers
- Protesters rally in Colorado to support Israel's fight with Hamas
- Plagiarism scandal threatens Senate campaign of Montana Democrat John Walsh
- Conservative groups decry Democrats' 'war on women' tactic
- Act would create tax-free savings accounts for the disabled
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Hillary Clinton: I was indeed 'dead broke,' but shouldn't have said so
- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Rush Limbaugh: 'There is no journalism anymore'
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world