- ‘Tis the Season: London florist creates $4.6 million Christmas wreath
- No tailgating allowed at Super Bowl XLVIII
- Pentagon to transport African troops to Central African Republic
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
Supercommittee stays opaque
Questions budget director for politically charged facts
The congressional debt-reduction panel met publicly for the first time in more than a month Wednesday but offered little public evidence of making progress as the clock ticks toward a Thanksgiving deadline.
Instead, it was at private meetings this week that the so-called supercommittee made the most noise, after aides leaked news of a Democratic plan to cut federal deficits by about $3 trillion. The proposal calls for about $1.3 trillion in new tax revenue during the next decade coupled with spending cuts of the same amount.
Republicans reportedly have a counterproposal, but no details have surfaced.
On Wednesday, the 12 members of the bipartisan panel spent almost two hours lobbing rhetorical questions at their only witness - Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas W. Elmendorf - with the main purpose of receiving answers to back up their partisan positions.
Sen. Patty Murray, a Washington state Democrat and a panel co-chairman, asked Mr. Elmendorf to assess the economic impact of further discretionary spending cuts beyond those Congress already has authorized - an inquiry meant to highlight Democratic distrust of Republican-proposed cuts.
“Over time, cuts in discretionary spending reduce in general the services that the American public receives,” Mr. Elmendorf said.
Conversely, the supercommittee’s other co-chairman, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, Texas Republican, used some of his allotted time to ask whether President Obama’s 2009 economic stimulus package has accelerated growth in government discretionary spending.
Wednesday’s hearing did little to dispel widespread complaints that the supercommittee - which includes six members from both the House and Senate equally divided by party - meets almost exclusively in secret and hasn’t been forthcoming to the media or the public about their private discussions.
“There’s a certain irony that they had their first public hearing in weeks today at the same time the panel decided to leak news of their proposal to the press,” said John Wonderlich, policy director for the Sunlight Foundation, a nonpartisan group that advocates for greater government openness. “We shouldn’t have any reservations to say their real work is happening privately.”
Even some Capitol Hill lawmakers have grumbled about the panel’s lack of transparency.
“The supercommittee’s public hearing today was nothing more than an extended photo opportunity and a weak nod to transparency,” said Sen. Dean Heller, Nevada Republican who isn’t a member of the panel. “The American people deserve to know how these 12 members of Congress intend to spend their money or increase their taxes.”
The supercommittee, born out of this past summer’s bitter debt-ceiling deal, is tasked to identify by Thanksgiving $1.5 trillion in savings or new tax revenue. Failure would trigger $1.2 trillion in automatic spending cuts that would affect a wide range of domestic programs and the Pentagon.
The two big roadblocks facing the panel are how to tackle entitlement and tax reforms. Democrats have resisted significant cuts to Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and other entitlement programs, while Republicans have been steadfast in their opposition to any tax increases.
The supercommittee will hold its next public hearing on Tuesday. Witnesses scheduled to testify include former Republican Sens. Alan Simpson and Pete Domenici, and former Clinton administration advisers Erskine Bowles and Alice Rivlin, who all worked with past debt-reduction groups.
c This article is based in part on wire-service reports.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- John Boehner demands answers on NSA, phone records
Latest Blog Entries
By Tom Fitton
New photos confirm the attack's coordination and its cover-up
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- Israeli P.M. Benjamin Netanyahu backs out of Nelson Mandela funeral
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Obama pleads for peace in strife-torn Central African Republic
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- MILLER: Brady Campaign says Colorado recalls due to NRA, not grassroots opposition to gun control
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
The Constitution: Every issue, every time. No exceptions, no excuses. And how to get from here to there.
Crystal Wright is a black conservative woman living in Washington, D.C.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Why can’t humans just be free to be humans?
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow