- Marco Rubio: U.S. at social, moral crossroads
- ‘We’re coming for you, Barack Obama’: Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL
- White flags baffle NYPD: ‘We’re lucky it wasn’t a bomb’
- N.Y. Gov. Cuomo’s office interfered with, pressured corruption commission: report
- Brit lawmaker: I would fire on Israel if I lived in Gaza
- VA apologizes to forgotten Marine veteran locked in Fla. clinic, forced to call 911
- U.S. social and economic trends on worrisome track, survey finds
- McDonald nomination unanimously referred to full Senate
- Chuck Norris honorary chairman of NRA voter registration campaign
- GOP outraged Obamacare investigators able to get coverage with fake IDs
MOVIE REVIEW: ‘In Time’
Question of the Day
In his debut film, the minor cult-classic “Gattaca,” writer-director Andrew Niccol served up a sci-fi parable about inequality set in a genetically stratified world. With the new “In Time,” also about genetically blessed haves and have-nots, Mr. Niccol has essentially made the same movie again - just worse.
“Gattaca” was a thriller premised on a world dominated by preprogrammed genetic gifts, where the children of the affluent are made to order - perfect athletes, musicians, and scientists - and the comparatively weak natural-born are treated like second-class citizens.
“In Time” revolves around a world infused with a different sort of genetic determinism, based not on talent but on time. In this alternate reality, humans have been genetically engineered to live just 25 years.
But there’s a catch: They can live longer - while continuing to look 25 - if they earn, steal, trade or otherwise acquire additional time. The rich live forever and never grow old, while the poor die young and wanting.
Indeed, time forms the foundation of the world’s currency system, with each individual’s store of saved-up days and years glowing across their wrist, like a tattooed stopwatch that also serves as a bank account.
The narrative gimmick - taking the idea that “time is money” literally - is different from “Gattaca’s,” but the underlying shape of the story is the same. Like Mr. Niccol’s first film, “In Time” follows an underprivileged young man (Justin Timberlake) who finds a way to beat the system while attempting to outrun a sympathetic, highly competent detective (Cillian Murphy).
The movie discourages viewers from thinking too deeply about its genetically imposed time-based system. Which may be for the best, because it doesn’t make much sense. Even the cruelest capitalist overlords would want to take advantage of the additional productive life years lost by engineering individuals to live to just 25. But the system does make a certain sort of Hollywood sense: What producer wouldn’t be thrilled by the prospect of a world - and a cast - where everyone looks perpetually 25? That includes Mr. Timberlake’s mother, played by Olivia Wilde (in real life three years his junior), as well as wealthy octogenarian Phillipe Weis (“Mad Men’s” Vincent Kartheiser) and his genuinely young daughter Sylvia (Amanda Seyfried).
A rich time banker, Weis is the film’s villain, a monologizing capitalist caricature and a symbol of the story’s time-based economic inequality. Mr. Timberlake and Ms. Seyfried spend most of the second act trading off between “Bonnie and Clyde”-style robberies of Weis’ time banks and tedious diatribes about the injustice of their world’s unequal outcomes.
Mr. Niccol remains a competent visual stylist, obsessed with both tiny fashion details - a crew of gangsters who appear throughout looking like boy-band backup dancers - and the glories of monument-sized infrastructure - his characters are frequently framed against imposing dams and bridges, as if to suggest the size of their struggles.
In the end, the movie’s problems are too big to overcome. Despite its novel concept, its anti-capitalism is too generic to be stirring. Like so many contemporary demonstrations against fat cat bankers, it comes across as vague and uninformed - call it “Occupy Timex.” And the question the movie raises about its filmmakers is the same one often asked of the protesters in Zuccotti Park: Didn’t they have anything better to do with their time?
TITLE: “In Time”
CREDITS: Written and directed by Andrew Niccol
RATING: PG-13 for violence, sexual situation, very mean bankers
RUNNING TIME: 109 minutes
TWT Video Picks
The subsidies are a hit with patients who don't exist
- Democratic Sen. John Walsh plagiarized War College master's thesis: report
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- 'We're coming for you, Barack Obama': Top U.S. official discloses threat from ISIL terrorists
- Hezbollah warring in Syria could join fight against Israel
- Netanyahu's Wikipedia page replaced with giant Palestinian flag
- Hamas orders civilians to die in Israeli airstrikes
- Pro-Russia rebel commander suggests passengers died days before Malaysian flight
- TYRRELL: The birth of a new alignment in the Middle East
- Despite rhetoric, gun prosecutions plummet under Obama
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq